Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht?
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> Thu, 22 July 2010 13:54 UTC
Return-Path: <paf@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD3F3A6B3C for <dns-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uok41ZQfG6jt for <dns-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4983A6B20 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-Files: PGP.sig : 186
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAN/pR0xAZnwN/2dsb2JhbACfd3GmMpsihTYEiFk
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2010 13:54:12 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp5583.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp5583.cisco.com [10.61.85.206]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6MDsBR5022050; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:54:11 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-326-851939932"
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04023D10FC@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:54:10 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <85D4BB6F-61E1-427E-A979-1128CB47E8F1@cisco.com>
References: <782CF0E4-E144-4CE7-96A1-6222772F0ACC@shinkuro.com><4C482200.7070504@piuha.net><20100722121451.GI7273@unknown.office.denic.de> <7E40F4DC-F528-4F11-B4B0-34E016DD36EF@gmail.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04023D10FC@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>, IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht?
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:54:16 -0000
Wed dinner unfortunately collides with an ICANN SSAC meeting I have. And also, I think, and OpenDNSSEC "party" "thing" I hear rumours about that maybe some of DNSDIR is (will be) invited to. Patrik On 22 jul 2010, at 15.19, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Wednesday lunch would conflict with the WG chairs session. I put it > green, it would have been a yellow if the doodle session had a yellow > option. Dinner is (still) free. > > Dan > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dns-dir-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:dns-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Droms >> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:47 PM >> To: Peter Koch >> Cc: IETF DNS Directorate >> Subject: Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? >> >> I responded to the Doodle poll; Wed lunch is (currently) out, >> but I can reschedule the lunch commitment if that time is >> best for everyone else. >> >> - Ralph >> >> On Jul 22, 2010, at 8:14 AM 7/22/10, Peter Koch wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:48:32PM +0300, Jari Arkko wrote: >>>> I would like to. >>> >>> thanks, Jari. >>> >>>> At this point I would suggest Wednesday dinner or lunch slot, or >>>> alternatively (lower preference) Sunday night. If we are >> meeting for >>>> the >>> >>> I've set up a small doodle at >> <http://www.doodle.com/sqe5ax72h8pu9cg8> >>> without Sunday, because several of us will be at the BIND >> Forum meeting. >>> >>>> dinner/night slots, I'd prefer to see a relatively quick agenda. >>> >>> Coming up next. >>> >>> -Peter >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dns-dir mailing list >>> dns-dir@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-dir mailing list >> dns-dir@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir >> > _______________________________________________ > dns-dir mailing list > dns-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir
- [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Jari Arkko
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Peter Koch
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Ralph Droms
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Stephen Morris
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Peter Koch
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dns-dir] Meeting in Maastricht? Peter Koch