Re: [dns-dir] [tim.polk@nist.gov: DISCUSS: <draft-ietf-behave-dns64-10.txt>]

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 18 August 2010 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF773A6922 for <dns-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fscOVVuuuBBl for <dns-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C733A68B8 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so408200qwc.31 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=aVXPtUdKFdCNjmyvbo/fjjcM1EM3vsugluFcwemvizQ=; b=fe16eJVhe0jAcddBu7ClLA9MBD87hcIR3uiVJKz00nG6H9Ymz5pDgZjJBDPba4Tt1Y vq2xuiSgGrDkjbmcJLrUkV74BOVEhJyR0u0Bszf9XU7DvreW5C/KVxL/3qLAoiRbjTvV I0LxExgKs/UEp2VKQ8yt2ER2Q+Gd1jeny+n3Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=jHIQBuwjnD6strOZ2tcXPe1QXr+1prYv+JRUzmMv9bFJDP+lte0lyAhvsTyesBL+JQ AR+EZ45wcXKl22Y5aSVpMdaFH49NeebnDJVYGEIFGM/Ac48SoUnRhVPqjPFe8m68ThNT MpPJ2XHrPn3BbWeqwInhj93TII+kUq4S608SQ=
Received: by 10.224.54.85 with SMTP id p21mr5249652qag.378.1282131120795; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bxb-rdroms-8718.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm148373qck.6.2010.08.18.04.31.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100812144452.GC63338@shinkuro.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:31:56 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <869C5178-0637-4374-9841-FB5393469C6E@gmail.com>
References: <20100812144452.GC63338@shinkuro.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: IETF Directorate DNS <dns-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] [tim.polk@nist.gov: DISCUSS: <draft-ietf-behave-dns64-10.txt>]
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:31:27 -0000

Andrew, Directorate - I've been asked again by the IESG for a Directorate review of this document.  I need a volunteer to read and comment as soon as possible.  Thanks.

- Ralph

On Aug 12, 2010, at 10:44 AM 8/12/10, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Will someone please review this?
> 
> A
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@shinkuro.com
> Shinkuro, Inc.
> 
> From: Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>
> Date: August 12, 2010 10:02:47 AM EDT
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-behave-dns64@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: DISCUSS: <draft-ietf-behave-dns64-10.txt>
> 
> 
> Discuss:
> I have some concerns regarding the impact on DNSSEC aware clients.  Is expecting these systems to be
> translation-aware practical?  I noticed the writeup mentioned the need for the DNS directorate review, but my
> review of the dns-dir archives did not turn up a review.  If the DNS directorate has reviewed  this document and
> supports publication I will clear.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-dir mailing list
> dns-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir