IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A391521F8BB6 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2lR+pB-J115 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f52.google.com (mail-vb0-f52.google.com [209.85.212.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134AF21F8B84 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fa15so4154129vbb.39 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=GpUgnSxl6rf6HV/YW9dFQpKj2zQFLA5Dy1593nbfFWU=; b=BB6/QAYGeRoPftD74HhS+qF9neXo1aicwNdLYVmyT3VerapH31yTSeGHQfWQDvEzxN wZjh/MXqFrj3ZKQesKDkxsMNcp8N5AVikDspIpcfpm1a7hKM+MvvQFH3PZICDPIi6QXS +E9ZR98KT697nw0huLY4+zaPOWBGvORRuEL/bsjtMGV1WgU/2DRcdM3iaixfgVLHf9PO 4w88Q26huuIMPVIt3AsNrYS13Ys78uX/LEjLe3t6Dv+MEKfAQdNGiaDS3Tx6ODCIw7qe BO3JZtq43sLz18jGqMZC6FtzDqdbV0KUsIMtFX8KQSAlYUJuymvHJzfzNPbXLoghkQ2s a2Jw==
X-Received: by 10.52.20.177 with SMTP id o17mr18351977vde.17.1361279364475; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:3443:d20e:4924:2f2? ([2001:420:2481:20:3443:d20e:4924:2f2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ly6sm101252462veb.3.2013.02.19.05.09.21 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:09:20 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0370390A-9855-4F41-8E1F-05FDA9A875D6@gmail.com>
References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34C673A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: dns-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:09:25 -0000

On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:23 PM 2/12/13, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:25:22PM +0000, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
>> Andrew - I see that you are listed as having reviewed a previous revision of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic.  Do you have any thoughts on draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 that should be reflected in my IESG review?
>> 
> 
> The problem I tripped over last time was the use of NXRRSET, which
> isn't what turned out to be wanted.  This was fixed in -12.
> 
> I'll be perfectly honest that I think this entire thing is a massive,
> unsustainable kludge.  But given that it's all part of the NAT64
> craptacular pile, that's not really an objection, and being one of the
> offenders who made that pile as high as it is I can hardly object
> anyway.

One more question: draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 is in ready to publish, waiting in cluster C83.  Did you consider section 5, Domain Name Reservation Considerations, of that document; specifically, although draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 has not yet been published, is it  worth the effort to answer the questions in section 5?

- Ralph

> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> dns-dir mailing list
> dns-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email