Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in Orlando
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sun, 10 March 2013 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4CA2921F8816 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JS+tR7nLaVeM for
<dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA6721F8168 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (dhcp-2430.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.36.48])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client
certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
CE5CA8A031; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:54:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:53:59 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: Stephen Morris <sa.morris7@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <20130310165359.GB37514@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <20130309214149.GI1197@x28.adm.denic.de>
<9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0A5A64@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
<1AADE646-9765-400F-BAB1-40617969B01B@fugue.com>
<513CA5C1.9050809@googlemail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <513CA5C1.9050809@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>,
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "dns-dir@ietf.org" <dns-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in Orlando
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>,
<mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>,
<mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:54:21 -0000
I guess I would ask what we want to achieve with this meeting. We've had three meetings in a row now where we said that, real soon, we'd have a proposal for a new mode of organization. It appears to be an indicator of either the cycles we have or the relative importance we place on this that no such proposal has come forward (I figure I can make this criticism, since I was one of the people supposed to do the proposing). We're going to have a constitutional problem soon, however, because if DNSEXT isn't closed before the week is out it will be next week. So two ex-officio members will in principle disappear. What would we like from the directorate? It seems to me that the thing we have most fallen down on -- ensuring that people are tracking work that has DNS consequences -- is the thing most urgently needed. So I'd like to propose a reorganization in which we look for explcit reviewer volunteers, and have a performance requirement to give us a mechanism to remove those participants who are too busy actually to do the work from the roster. (We have a lot of these.) The directorate could also function as the expert pool from which we select experts for RRTYPE and EDNS0 OPT code assignments. If people like this idea, then if we're going to meet I'd like to talk about people we'd want to approach to be on the directorate. A On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:24:49AM -0400, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 10/03/2013 10:56, Ted Lemon wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2013, at 8:14 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote: > >> FWIW - I am booked on Wednesday at 13:00. Let's Doodle. > > > > Sounds like a good plan. Who's going to set it up? > > I will: > > http://www.doodle.com/zrkrw8r5epx3ub2k > > ... broadly covering Wednesday afternoon to Friday morning. No idea as > to a location though. > > Stephen > > _______________________________________________ > dns-dir mailing list > dns-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@crankycanuck.ca
- [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in Orla… Peter Koch
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Ted Lemon
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Stephen Morris
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Ted Lemon
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Stephen Morris
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Benoit Claise
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Lars-Johan Liman
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Ralph Droms
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Ralph Droms
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Stephen Morris
- Re: [dns-dir] DNS directory org/reorg session in … Ralph Droms