[dns-privacy] [Errata Rejected] RFC8467 (7874)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 23 April 2024 12:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E52C14F610; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GaNLLM3_VyW9; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E5AC14F61C; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 942A711FDEC; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: hello.world@example.com, alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240423122907.942A711FDEC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:29:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/0wh6vrYWR2TWNKIQPQJscEx17iM>
Subject: [dns-privacy] [Errata Rejected] RFC8467 (7874)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:29:11 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8467, "Padding Policies for Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7874 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: hello world <hello.world@example.com> Date Reported: 2024-03-28 Rejected by: Eric Vyncke (IESG) Section: 6 Original Text ------------- Note that even with encryption and padding, it might be trivial to identify that the observed traffic is DNS. Corrected Text -------------- Note that even with encryption and padding, it might be easy to identify that the observed traffic is DNS. Notes ----- easy to understand what that means. --VERIFIER NOTES-- While the suggested text*might* be easier to read (and as a non-English speaker easy/trivial are easy to read even if they do not convey the same semantic), it is not worth a verified errata IMHO. -------------------------------------- RFC8467 (draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Padding Policies for Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)) Publication Date : October 2018 Author(s) : A. Mayrhofer Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : DNS PRIVate Exchange Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dns-privacy] [Errata Rejected] RFC8467 (7874) RFC Errata System