Re: [dns-privacy] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: (with COMMENT)

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Thu, 05 March 2020 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D68F3A1470; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sinodun.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4mSXIQZ6Mfy; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A0B3A1471; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:18:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sinodun.com ; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=+8oxWdv6vd+w9WcvcE1cJX+d6/9FQSm5vW43CbKc7Jc=; b=M9ef1LQWM5RmN3R6bFiJu6lwh/ m7hem/en9QOZ4BwjMEpvQfDfHQnL5iRC6Zv/ehcZy1orngbIc3Gm0k4TVb8y/WqHcGV32ZgpCBXml jxIPHvbLmVAoXJYki+O79c21p4G9twEfaXl+9i3GCrabf4I3QvTS/fEDRoTDV3amJel9mPzN+wi/B gkPQoLup7Qrt6fK3bhwESEOFI/DWE5FSbTA9QUlcw5EMZbZLziyWnW1lVu3/Yq8PrC+m1fbuZc9So CuAntFSKv+mZCcpVggM2V9KfDjQ8pKj3iDAExQfqff9yITsmpLhwNJVhq70nmlY8TDdypMvKwShP1 5HGwEVGA==;
Received: from [2001:b98:204:102:fffa::2] (port=53438) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1j9qOC-0004Dn-SH; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:18:16 +0000
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Message-Id: <55634D03-EE22-4349-923F-AAFB746924A7@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6517A4C-9FD8-43BA-B07A-AA0FE75F7D8C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:18:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <DC3FC2EF-9B7D-47E0-920D-E660A02415F0@kaloom.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op@ietf.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "dprive-chairs@ietf.org" <dprive-chairs@ietf.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
To: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
References: <158096719686.30586.13019021669612010866.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6D632533-30DC-4975-B65F-50A7B1CA2B50@sinodun.com> <DC3FC2EF-9B7D-47E0-920D-E660A02415F0@kaloom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/1OCevIaXBtM5AlBYAX6WlLthTn4>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:18:21 -0000


> On 4 Mar 2020, at 13:54, Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 8:31 AM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6 Feb 2020, at 05:33, Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: No Objection
>>> 
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> * Section 5.2.3.
>>> 
>>> I found Table 1 to be extremely confusing. It is not clear from the table
>>> whether all of the properties are concurrently applicable to a certain
>>> technique when an "X" appears there. e.g. TC has marks for Format preserving,
>>> Prefix preserving, Reordering/Shuffling, and Random substitution. Some of these
>>> seem to be mutually exclusive. It would be good if you can clarify.
>> 
>> That was the intention of the table. TC (TCPdpriv - described in detail in Appendix B.3) preserves both the format and the longest prefix match but uses a random replacement for the remainder of the address.
>> 
>> Alissa suggested moving the table to Appendix B so it is in the context of the more detailed definitions of the categories and the individual techniques. I think that is a good idea - do you think that would address your concern?
> 
> Thanks Sara. That would work.

Great - thank you!

Sara.