Re: [dns-privacy] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profile

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 27 October 2016 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD2C1295C5 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_P7IXprMJOm for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F3E1294EF for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.105] (50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u9RE6ovU018453 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:06:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230] claimed to be [10.32.60.105]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Sara Dickinson" <sara@sinodun.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:06:54 -0700
Message-ID: <5659D16F-4744-4BCF-8D44-9A169DF4F800@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <46BE40A7-402E-4C69-9A43-4CE500D47853@sinodun.com>
References: <5dc29c0c-9f34-dcac-8d94-f2722ee6a4ba@gmail.com> <03AC11BC-BE33-47B8-B1A2-1BDC26280B2C@vpnc.org> <7BAA0258-E476-4940-8430-80BC8ED4FD94@sinodun.com> <64813B2D-063A-49B2-8A82-7C248681B641@vpnc.org> <46BE40A7-402E-4C69-9A43-4CE500D47853@sinodun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/2zAeAXjMRRLGTirQzNzoZXTQZyE>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profile
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:06:54 -0000

On 27 Oct 2016, at 5:35, Sara Dickinson wrote:

>> That would be good, yes. But "obtained" still sounds like it might 
>> come from the DNS itself, not from configuration or DHCP.
>
> Well it could come from DNS via a SRV lookup.

How could it come from SRV? I am thinking (perhaps incorrectly) that it 
has to only come from configuration or DHCP.

> Do you prefer acquired/determine/derive?

No, because none of those sound like "gotten locally".

--Paul Hoffman