IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] A Few More Suggestions for the Requirements Draft

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Mon, 19 April 2021 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD41C3A3CCC for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=tcb.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZMj7ewon3NH for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hollyman.com (mail.hollyman.com [209.97.151.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4238B3A3CD1 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.hollyman.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id 84E303F0E3; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tcb.net; s=mail; t=1618855127; bh=NRQ0vFbxQRkZ0WOse4PjMQmZJ8tGfF+0hwZrx1SUpTU=; h=To:Subject:Date:From:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lJxuFPpS9+tSVd49uGWWb1qYwfTYPfRUiRJjHD/ux3j8K8IkmeTrKffwtY20nFtWp hm793DOV4TsXtJQ6dLFoLTy4frQLCDv7HsrSCUHnIqZuNx9ZlIMnc9OqvXjaWrOOOo owYVC/8RYxJa5h1irkaI2VnTOyUNf8F8FZU4orew=
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:58:47 -0400
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
Cc: dprive@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1BE0F181-68A1-464A-9D7D-824181F4A69B@icann.org>
References: <fc3621bb82f24753ba3a17d60df59879@verisign.com> <E2D1CEE3-64F1-4A48-8EF3-19B37ABB0F83@icann.org> <064c169412764689a3129b8e162806ac@verisign.com> <1BE0F181-68A1-464A-9D7D-824181F4A69B@icann.org>
Message-ID: <e79a2c21dfd70a122e3c49d6d3cb6b59@tcb.net>
X-Sender: danny@tcb.net
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2-beta
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/4wQjFfuhfSk-d1cN4UA5dNDHMbw>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] A Few More Suggestions for the Requirements Draft
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:58:57 -0000

On 2021-04-19 13:52, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> I don't think so, because the WG has been actively developing those
> requirements without the draft moving forward, just by having good WG
> discussions.

Not sure what that means.  Is there a summary of those "good WG 
discussions" and where consensus may or may not exist?

I'd prefer to have some succinct and comprehensive requirements here 
before finishing all the solutioning...



-danny

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email