[dns-privacy] Usage on DNS-over-TLS on IETF Network

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8B7131DF2 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dNWD7ONI-sDx for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com (mail-wr0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE55131DF0 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a10so25111209wrd.0 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IkLfYrmW/fpxnCuE3RY3/CQIr6BV2pmIl4J5O5Ik7ik=; b=CQkVCkpGz+bBoEQyXkDCifi/nphpGCbvOm/LqynzITgGd5qdkTm2yTjMflRjkqXIFp AOzUlEHEzquRiGDGY5gmK7V+N/f1jt8AG6eTdKs0MjwhpGKkSPehsjcagmRBCVPuN0G/ 5de2jfOr35CuyLfJom+go212SYBzaEeF2CRzBz7NI6Uz3gbTccdGPK8Hb8CnKa06VEZf aeUNNE6tZmpcKmDjarLEsx8eU5AYbpCWK/WdzxOfmfbK3SgjQHpcmFK6F+IqkeSaslgj +8P/MxjDIEgnIQApu3LSv4/+ZJMxGcz6DKs3HJE1leAxiyNj9J+1JCS4MkHQBhVTPuGY DPgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IkLfYrmW/fpxnCuE3RY3/CQIr6BV2pmIl4J5O5Ik7ik=; b=HSnNPoZ2esSe5joVJXbhwVgL+Yz32h3HnqcMmMa76zNsHzITJzINsK+C9wv2W/26fQ qHnJxtjAo/7hWrUidhIkivM5vLOILWdccok7yq59PzCaV9IGBVDaHptHTFrsDSzRUBIf D6msv68CBZPPtkNBNhC3w9UM4q0Fy8z0RSwNJUagFq5dSfrD2juAkrotdb1XGPNKhejn GW2tI32al1d+kZ4n5c5kTIN9k0tccX9gRIqN8PCCACXq3IWtYKTFxH3S0BA3b2w1bOP7 rPBYoq6xeQrCiTBMrSZbyJQoN2LBoz7eRBamGUj4yPb94iOXnB6OK5WkwdJLdQsTXwA9 ePPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112aBmAdCkGEuIb7pI1A+IcDeVVwj2K1IQcoYsCgvCtYB2xzTpos kyxDwQ9qHaoQnbESaQfxfpxYbyx43w==
X-Received: by 10.28.14.210 with SMTP id 201mr1803049wmo.85.1500377368409; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.152.139 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:29:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Gj9gCA_KqPxMj-5KuOX5_UoR9BK21+Tib2qdg9FFWrVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a1143196012fad2055495d4ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/93pWil_vLic-SN5pDXtS9VCS9-M>
Subject: [dns-privacy] Usage on DNS-over-TLS on IETF Network
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:29:32 -0000

Or TLS-over-DNS depending on how you view the world

Our former co-chair Warren sent us these slides on DNS usage on the IETF
network and also DPRIVE usage.  It's a small number (but not zero!)

Thanks Warren (though you could of made the axis markings bigger....)

I also put them into the meeting materials.

tim