[dns-privacy] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-10: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 09 March 2022 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDEA3A0D90; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 03:35:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic@ietf.org, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, brian@innovationslab.net, dns-privacy@ietf.org, brian@innovationslab.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <164682573775.27907.1864957485306671134@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 03:35:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/9wusQa1ioJdbWhZDF_yCz8OSShE>
Subject: [dns-privacy] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:35:38 -0000

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks a lot for working on this specification. Thanks to Brian Trammell  for
the TSVART review.

I have following comments and I think addressing them will improve this
documentation-

   * Section 5.3.3 - should also list the protocol error case related to 
   session resumption and 0-RTT, and put a reference to section 5.5 for further
   details.

   * Section 5.2 says -

     "Implementations MAY impose a limit on the number of such dangling
     streams. If limits are encountered, implementations MAY close the
     connection."

     However, I have  not notices any indication  of how this limits can be
     set. I would be great if we can say how the implementer can enforce the
     normative "MAY".