Re: [dns-privacy] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Wed, 05 May 2021 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFA23A090D for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9k3GbGpI1Yxi for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8049F3A0906 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id y124-20020a1c32820000b029010c93864955so2575646wmy.5 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 May 2021 21:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ukd8N/T+Jn9lostcpBmS5pJ0iNCf8oKdFCPVpuh8oBk=; b=LObrOdDr7EpwNXXsY8vzX/+jdj1wNJ+xJ5OK0mExiGZHLHEBNWGfgeE7+J8hE4m2fO xlTXY8yz2gaPizUnJsA8k0Ln6YUsmxuNhToA1ahtIX/kCZhFxbhH/WcNOzETMDjFNfw1 uBwoGzFxroPKSilbX2FwuEO5sau3zjPdCP2VLeb6StsFHsm5NbvHskrPGvBul3+9wMgf lsYCfqoixwOdyunzeYAojCJyxCAzqPSoACnncRQhAjB3ER1eXS69kUaGUkZA1Q2d7hxE m/cgiolOP+oCfeNcfGzXbAvh7Goi3wUxKD/Zz2TRJt4ZXwxe0hNVpG55vF86XV/eG3Mq m0jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ukd8N/T+Jn9lostcpBmS5pJ0iNCf8oKdFCPVpuh8oBk=; b=H7LXmfi3sy38/sstawXWvCWhu6egIm47z63JzAlojqiY5MuOJVt0BSvV78xlfFq/2X E8HF2+R02PSDPrI3txUBtOnKr+C1vYRYWqyzifEIR9SLUt+MRJTgFoG68yUJ6ezTqhH0 njkFdBTQNjZ1jvRQ2PUwDD0H+OsRDXl6i7Rsuaa5AOew1MBuOv60V65T7RmyTUpTQASu jfu/gE+W3hPwFLZeRpwZPmBwS9G5SpHI2bbyCeJDLXwB8owFQXGJ9ce+zh2MFk1F69yI HPxWFTGZGqFmuP3tL97Jcv8Ww89RgagRP66a7LH/6MiZ9X+mxxBwTLCXEzB2gp5ttNoJ N+eQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qmgXxd2XQ7unFsgl5aTWbEepEl2QEo+1hffvDFgsMZIY85QGk cF3chKPZ3nUzjakpS+vODcueyNUdwYZwghFdpWSQJQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDEwgwFqrorRltW8yW882a5IzGhcNUtyWGm5CEProiOOZUa45v/+r5gNiBYzitHQ0iHaAjYLLOEokv+zpRJA8=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c196:: with SMTP id y22mr12456528wmi.1.1620189543001; Tue, 04 May 2021 21:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162006706040.3639.6179900042922096790@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALUxDspOEaSGnUdhh2ASFp6wOc66pdEy+kdRQudgw0EG-C3K9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxQNyY+pZb-Dw7grKneULGfwjt5pV5GLjBsH9hf_Jp=yAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriWemNKoV_COKkE-tUgrW0Dqvk5UDCLmjNB0Bm3meWvSzQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriWemNKoV_COKkE-tUgrW0Dqvk5UDCLmjNB0Bm3meWvSzQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 21:38:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsCh05zCQEkDoBww8MctJsMW6itpC1ceT1RuFowrq4n_2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Allison Mankin <amankin@salesforce.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000034396205c18dc6bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ACYoMdV3m522Fql5rVrs2uVxuOc>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 04:39:11 -0000

Yes, the "dot" ALPN came well after RFC 7858 was published, so most of the
early implementations don't send it.

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:33 PM Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> When I went to go find where the "dot" ALPN came from I couldn't find it
> easily.
>
> The IANA registry said 7858, but when we did DoT for Android I didn't
> remember any ALPN text, and I couldn't find it in 7858.  Nor could I find
> it in 8310.  Perhaps I just wasn't paying close enough attention.
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>