IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments

Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk> Thu, 09 January 2020 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACFA1200F6; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eA0_dY9s9mwa; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.noware.co.uk (unknown [IPv6:2604:a880:0:1010::add:2001]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359D21200F1; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.170] (unknown [81.151.217.99]) by mail.noware.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E05001C7008; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:14:18 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20200109153037.GC28511@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:26:01 +0000
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, last-call@ietf.org, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B78BFED8-D2C3-46F5-A7FE-A3A123B0D95C@noware.co.uk>
References: <4639bd67-6fca-47d1-aaeb-85fcd0394f46@www.fastmail.com> <7E5F804D-535F-4CB3-8F7F-ABD0ED4B833A@sinodun.com> <CABcZeBON0ung2htbaiKWGKJSUsHrPhrcEfJgVDoO3+UYCQZxsg@mail.gmail.com> <7729E44B-38EB-4EAF-8EFF-ED286696373E@sinodun.com> <CABcZeBNKsQ1pEVwxwYMgGTUhFntQ4h+L1Qyo=Q_nfN7p13y-UQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200109153037.GC28511@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdeiuddgheefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecupffgkffnvefqqffmnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpefpvghilhcuvehoohhkuceonhgvihhlrdgtohhokhesnhhofigrrhgvrdgtohdruhhkqeenucfkphepkedurdduhedurddvudejrdelleenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepkedurdduhedurddvudejrdelledphhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrudejtdgnpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheppfgvihhlucevohhokhcuoehnvghilhdrtghoohhksehnohifrghrvgdrtghordhukheqpdhrtghpthhtohepsghorhhtiihmvgihvghrsehnihgtrdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopegvkhhrsehrthhfmhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlrghsthdqtggrlhhlsehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegunhhsqdhprhhivhgrtgihsehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsrghrrgesshhinhhoughunhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/BRB23E41G2DzUL2ORWRTeCLvvTM>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:26:05 -0000


> On 9 Jan 2020, at 15:30, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 02:47:02PM -0800,
> Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote 
> a message of 310 lines which said:
> 
>> Yeah, my point is that I don't agree with this. Right now there is a
>> lot of ISP centralization and the move of some of that traffic to
>> public resolvers potentially decreases centralization at the margin.
> 
> Also, when we document SMTP issues, do we mention the current
> centralisation in a few email providers? I don't think so. Therefore,
> why doing it for the DNS?

Well why not switch it the other way round and say that we definitely should for SMTP? It’s getting harder and harder to actually get mail delivered if you run your own mail server.

Neil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email