Re: [dns-privacy] Multiple DNS requests per packet, multiple packet responses

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 21 March 2014 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDFD1A0794 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wg9wVM-e5zkS for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AA91A08F0 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2993D800AA; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:42:46 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1395420166; bh=lFCSwucqU5B1Ig2hamon91tNFuAYEylPZdZUUZTUMWw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=eOLkNmlKSWZ6HWU3qDZvlvV6lrV6HYrF98meC7mZJEexdyjw7hc3u7b+/MzS7ZM3n Frj4lN4UbSRbIe+VY+mTOryl/yFw16sgPrM42hzRajzZbzsP1V63yE7L9h+x5IIve8 D757cC3mxzXLlCwrCeFiqnIGxvhJXwN8caJYjAzM=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s2LGgjWx029692; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:42:45 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:42:45 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhP9YNu+tOWCs7TTV-cguB4tvPf1B5e8V_KOSaDuJq_kw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1403211241180.13863@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAMm+LwgXExHH6YxpvQLEsgZ+C4uUjvv0E=+g0XBmWVBrQnG_-w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAVkUtLZ95g-Enk1EaSif4FOuuCy_utwcHYDN3Vjw3xjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwi_aLqyyC4ek_twcr_x_XC6J1AOFbEgJkHaAe=skfSmLw@mail.gmail.com> <532A9BDF.80401@nlnetlabs.nl> <CAMm+LwjysRvkKqH=HeuQtxf8Kh0VRBDzwW63G0Z58yb0ptQB2w@mail.gmail.com> <532BC100.4050704@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhP9YNu+tOWCs7TTV-cguB4tvPf1B5e8V_KOSaDuJq_kw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/C6jCsQCv11tMnEUcNVvlQ-04Bfw
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Multiple DNS requests per packet, multiple packet responses
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:42:58 -0000

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> Or possibly more practical would be to have a strategy where UDP is
> the default but there is a fallback over HTTP.

If you want to be censorship resistant, you should make DNS
encryption integral to DNS. Not have some appendix that someone
can easilly cut off.

Paul