Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls.

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Thu, 18 August 2016 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FEE12D0BC; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.767
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.767 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRMoNBHGGG2g; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153BE12B015; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12956; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471497274; x=1472706874; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=AyjLYUmnPlHS25cAcgjaEkgQuT4NOVqU9X0akX9Oz0Q=; b=LcK7Lly2auxjbKQ6ko+eunUtfZ5NVUo6HNycXQut6nM0p3X4/+7aZAu2 TPJs7UKYQs21Ysx6LQCVF/XhgeWJsVhluwMVBZPAhbb6zTygJYOTVil1S HXZlaJ0K0B2/pSKusYAF0Hpavm4xovSCicnhffbv/AcV42ismsEXDxog7 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DJAgADHrVX/5NdJa1eDoJoTlZ8B7JNgniCD4F9JIV5AhyBSjgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4ReAQEFIwpMEAIBCA4DBAEBKAMCAgIwFAkIAgQBDQUIiCkOrXuQGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFhiqETYQqLR+CS4JaBZlEAYYfiHeBcoRcgzKEL4EhjDuDdwEeNoM/O26GLn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,537,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="312282850"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Aug 2016 05:14:33 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7I5EXS9001769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:14:33 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:14:32 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:14:32 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Thread-Topic: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls.
Thread-Index: AQHR9+CDOfLshiPyWUOvmEml7Lnb/qBNoDCAgACNdOA=
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:14:32 +0000
Message-ID: <e1354ea4f0f946399237a561de2c3818@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
References: <CAHw9_iLWW-e_de9ieq_oe_eR=RBWg9swG7EiAPTp93825Vm=pw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+nkc8AQHF1vD5V9rMd=WHHNERt8zKa5s+XKmNAbHWshXuzL-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8AQHF1vD5V9rMd=WHHNERt8zKa5s+XKmNAbHWshXuzL-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.56.209]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e1354ea4f0f946399237a561de2c3818XCHRCD017ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/CLUbYxeWdkSdjRdIgpKY4_jOji8>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, "DPRIVE-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <DPRIVE-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls.
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:14:36 -0000

From: Bob Harold [mailto:rharolde@umich.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:13 PM
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls@ietf.org; DPRIVE-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls.



On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net<mailto:warren@kumari.net>> wrote:
Dear DPRIVE WG,

The authors of draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls have indicated that they
believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group
Last Call.

The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/

Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for
publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

This WGLC ends Tue 30-Aug-2016.

In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"):
Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in
compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378
for more details.)

Thanks,
Warren Kumari

Looks good to me.  A couple grammatical concerns:

Section "3.1.  Session Initiation"
The last sentance might sound better by adding "therefore" in the middle:

"There are
   significant security issues in mixing protected and unprotected data,
            therefore
   UDP connections on a port designated by a given server for DNS-over-
   DTLS are reserved purely for encrypted communications."

[TR] Updated in my local copy.

Section "4. Performance Considerations"
This sentence does not read well to me:

"TLS False Start] which reduces round-trips
   by allowing the TLS second flight of messages (ChangeCipherSpec) to
   also contain the (encrypted) DNS query. "

[TR] How about the following line ?
TLS False Start [I-D.ietf-tls-falsestart] can reduce the round-trips in certain situations.

-Tiru

--
Bob Harold