[dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC...
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 16 August 2016 17:09 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1B312D8F1 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXcFpC7xn50a for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A14A12D8E9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v123so77201115qkh.2 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z7gafnjiVH6og9d2tcIKhNvM/fFWvSUzXyXiNs+sw+4=; b=KyP0zzDYgeqneC/CzsLhXdDUw0zL1WYSJHT8MMf7EoRzRaPBaHnUmEUJ1lXDh/bbI3 ZCs0O7hA5n6NpRrOPXJo7l7hYmwpAdq3mmQ1Rg2A8O5rKUEND1bs+q9dWnnGAlTg/j4s WJsm4Xba541TtlqLCb9iEwpR5GlKlGvMv04LI0NP1EYEqWAgCgtsIKQCFPovHqtj9w6o pBsxuycxvKoD9FhdLoGdpIiP4FDjU7q2zAg2M3oz8uAkqBE4eqdhtRSs3IrLbtKLjybe sXUcNCt0yoZXKcnrmIB9PwtKplxj2aLmgkX30yNNOAymWeiosbHjG9Hwu/V0ciZgWuNy +SEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z7gafnjiVH6og9d2tcIKhNvM/fFWvSUzXyXiNs+sw+4=; b=R9wnY2DO0mrZ3tu/WLjczUn9e7TM4uqXzzh7jSBh/0Y7b8Xjg2Dop6RKJxSrw75ryE 89JfrJYXFnDptdlOzA8ojlGfS4s3xFlU9P0T1yLarqHXtP56rGeytad52sCdT4pRqOwM i5HKcuCQdULGpPUNYIVtyRgke9hX/eud2B6KVU13DUs5/C+h6APXQzyXzWtxsvf33Qt9 1Ra9fgduwGWnMypnW8WCWjuUVsXt2wt274ENSTwa7Q/SdlnIFXdHP+Zsrp9s38X5FtT7 q1u5Oj9E1BGjQhBoRpoZlwa9FBFiWlFKU7t6O1nlHfe2sXOBdiYziUb5hpB30HTHdsTD CWuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous0e2jzQKRNU/nJRetFXL/ZuUlmQ5jPZb2KyHP0Bn+KM0AhYHzXqv6scyKVavTUL8wpHEikgl5c5V20K6Tt
X-Received: by 10.55.5.17 with SMTP id 17mr39199532qkf.280.1471367356399; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.176.199 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:08:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLjE5Yf28xH_Qy8nOCiyu-Q3fGxF6iQWm-OuXJSbjrRhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/DKZ1pkaEWMP31ijdw6WkgJbX7Lg>
Subject: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC...
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:09:19 -0000
Dear DPRIVE, We have just started the WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls. There have been a significant number of changes and revisions to this document, please take some time to review it and provide clear feedback to the authors and WG. We will be focusing on the “profiles” document after the DNSoDTLS document wraps up. We still feel that it is premature to recharter for “phase 2”, but would very much like to encourage discussions on the list of how me might begin to address the recursive to auth part of this. Stephane has some interesting initial thoughts here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2/ - it is an easy read, please take some time to read and thing about it. At the moment we are expecting to meet in Seoul, partly to discuss the Profiles document, but also as a “BoF style” discussion on the Phase 2 work. Thoughts? Views? etc. Warren and Tim. -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
- [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Warren Kumari
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Hugo Connery
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Dan York
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Warren Kumari
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Warren Kumari
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Sara Dickinson
- Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC... Stephane Bortzmeyer