IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] More WGLC reviews for TLS Profiles draft?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 10 December 2016 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752D129687 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:55:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0FHgVw4y7365 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B500129517 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id F188D31D88; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:55:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4316EC0AE3; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:52:05 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:52:05 +0000
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Message-ID: <20161210085205.GA6532@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <6cdc7899-f0f4-e735-a844-1a40bf1314fb@gmail.com> <EF0487AF-5D73-417F-A4C3-F3D42CCA3E05@sinodun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <EF0487AF-5D73-417F-A4C3-F3D42CCA3E05@sinodun.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/EhS2fPQXuJAC0KmMSeaGIn8Q0xk>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] More WGLC reviews for TLS Profiles draft?
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:55:42 -0000

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:51:51AM +0000,
 Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote 
 a message of 138 lines which said:

> Just to follow up on Tim’s mail. Any reviews of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles/> would be much appreciated to try to wind up the WGLC asap.

I've read draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-07 and I've little
to add to what I said in
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/qKI3hnyCDywqYqCxFIyRDkYOvIA>
The points I raised there have been well addressed.

I'm still a bit concerned about the issue of detection (that there is
an attack). Detection for passive attacks is only possible if there is
a prior history, unlike the detection for active attacks, but I have
no concrete suggestion to improve table 1, while keeping it simple to
read.

So, it is OK for me, draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-07 can be
published.

Editorial:

None found

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email