Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 18 March 2021 14:49 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6503A2D0B for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5Rpj9J6QC1p for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5E83A2D09 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1VL433HKz387 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:49:48 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1616078988; bh=qb2HGp6XYEEf21SkiE2TRUOOL4NoS9FCdZsgwYv0vZ0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=owcB7WOYCuErR65tlbzHDis93B+XfDrNyifIZMvCnjT1nlYSAbmEnsp6bFhtvUKEI HUrXbk4FwaKSXR0X1riaE6f1E6AaJ8UqRBf70bFAJE/i8VrnI3RYT2FgL91BkF0KN8 AjkpxhhZy4yRLAAAkhNhjHB9ekgjOLuVRT35vtUg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YY06ppQrsLn3 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:49:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:49:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E82F06029A61; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F1166B7E for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:49:45 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C74CFE8D-EEF1-42A6-BEEF-DBE8CCD8E407@noware.co.uk>
Message-ID: <b0546835-87ca-bd72-30e2-40e63f28d2b7@nohats.ca>
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net> <86e54685-ab6e-83b5-e4f6-bbd71fc6dd5a@nic.cz> <C74CFE8D-EEF1-42A6-BEEF-DBE8CCD8E407@noware.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/IXokuBHbdSj46-63q0uE7Swf26k>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:49:54 -0000
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Neil Cook wrote: > I oppose adoption. For precisely the same reasons that Tomas lays out below, I am also opposing adoption. The issue is not that we need another transport protocol. We need a better way to decouple the stub/client data from the resolver/auth data. How the client reaches their resolver should not be relevant to this problem. What is relevant is how resolver pooling can decouple the stub from the auth server. I would rather see a new method where caching resolvers can feed each other in a pool in such a way as to give endusers their query privacy. Additionally, those why require this can already use TOR, which is such a transport mechanism that is not just specified as a DNS transport. Paul >> On 18 Mar 2021, at 12:02, Tomas Krizek <tomas.krizek@nic.cz> wrote: >> >> I oppose adoption. >> >> The draft introduces huge amount of additional complexity, both for >> implementors and operators of DoH. This raises the bar for both smaller >> vendors and operators, thus leading to more centralization. >> >> Additionally, the problem it attempts to solve is not DoH-specific, or >> even DNS-specific, yet it only provides a solution for DoH. >> >> On 17/03/2021 14.00, Brian Haberman wrote: >>> All, >>> This starts a DPRIVE WG call for adoption for >>> draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh >>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh/). >>> Please reply to the mailing list with your views (positive or negative) >>> on the WG adopting the document and your supporting arguments. >>> >>> This call will end on March 31, 2021 at 11:59pm UTC. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Brian & Tim >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dns-privacy mailing list >>> dns-privacy@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >>> >> >> -- >> Tomas Krizek >> PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-privacy mailing list >> dns-privacy@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
- [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-d… Brian Haberman
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: dra… Eric Orth
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: dra… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Martin Thomson
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Rob Sayre
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Martin Thomson
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Watson Ladd
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Petr Špaček
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Tomas Krizek
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Neil Cook
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: dra… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: dra… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Tomas Krizek
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Eric Orth
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Eric Orth
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: dra… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Neil Cook
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Christopher Wood
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… David Schinazi
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Rob Sayre
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Rob Sayre
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pau… Brian Haberman