From nobody Tue Jul 6 08:05:08 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13793A2AB8; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:05:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pXR8WhagZPt1; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC073A2AD2; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [86.85.149.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0276D6A0D2; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from plato ([86.85.149.247]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id rZM1OxNx5GB3UQAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from ); Tue, 06 Jul 2021 17:04:51 +0200 Message-ID: From: Peter van Dijk To: RFC Errata System Cc: joeri.deruiter@surf.nl, sara@sinodun.com, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, roland@nlnetlabs.nl, allison.mankin@gmail.com, dns-privacy@ietf.org, evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 17:04:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <253fb97-d0d4-efd7-817a-fa851ffe2d63@nohats.ca> References: <20210705131118.1D835F40725@rfc-editor.org> <253fb97-d0d4-efd7-817a-fa851ffe2d63@nohats.ca> Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8932 (6629) X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 15:05:02 -0000 On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 09:33 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Perhaps instead of ephemeral/non-ephemeral, a fix would be: > > One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port > numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the > original port was a system port (<=1024) or non-system port (>1024). system port (<1024) or non-system port (>=1024) Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/