Re: [dns-privacy] DPRIVE agenda for IETF 111

[Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Brian Haberman wrote:

>>>    Here is the preliminary agenda for the DPRIVE session at IETF 111.
>>> If there are no objections or late additions, the chairs will cancel the
>>> second 1-hour slot assigned to DPRIVE.
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dprive-00
>>
>> As we have two drafts that are assuming that SVCB records for a zone can
>> be served at the parent, I think we need to talk aboutthis at the meeting.
>
> None of those draft authors requested agenda time.

okay.

>> I've tried to convey that this is an unrealistic reality, and that work
>> should focus on this not happening, eg drafts should not specify
>> "interim" solutions for this to happen. It would be good to get clear
>> working group consensus on this so the draft authors can take that
>> consensus into account for future draft versions.
>
> If you want to lead that discussion, please let the chairs know.

I have raised an issue to the WG that I think the chairs should take on to
discuss and hopefully resolve at the meeting.

If you want me to do a short presentation of the issue to facilitate
that discussion, I am happy to help you with that.

Paul