Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls.

["Paul Hoffman" <[e-mail]>]

Greetings. I have read the -10 draft, and think it is ready for moving 
to the IETF. The authors have done a good job of incorporating comments 
from the WG.

Because draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls might be abandoned in favor of RFC 
7858 after someone implements it and compares the two, it is appropriate 
that this is set to become an Experimental RFC. After testing, if 
implementers think that there is value to the DTLS version, it can be 
put on Standards Track. It will be interesting to see how that testing 
goes when it happens; I'm particularly interested in the tradeoff of 
"TCP state is kept in the kernel" vs. "session state is kept in the 
application stack" vs. DoS-by-CPU-exhaustion.

--Paul Hoffman