Re: [dns-privacy] Status of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis?

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Mon, 21 September 2020 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D26D3A0B6C for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 02:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jmBwXliaI-PO for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304A23A0B74 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 02:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EBA6A257 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:56:21 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1600682181; bh=YTiNYuCe18BtSrysEmbXQ4owSV02h9TGHKmd0CxBR10=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=DadFufDRosbl8LMWoI7SyGBDEWYLnWC+Bu5dBVCfV+RbbMhFyNxHPJeRq0vfy4FRi JZntgI7ygaSOBBq66sh/hIurNaazj5KJRTKyqt9U/ySfuCvz8G4oangsFXbPT68k3C xEDyDAgy/jzGgQYCyxujP9TFKXGJ8ldXE21BOQN5TmZ6lq7Gfoi6SwYfnmiv0hMvoo y/PTxbVglYccSCqJ+rhBwQr+9D+dhvXBrm5oXLPNwCWgibeL+qmVsIG/qwugdqkIYH 4MjiRE1nlydXmqqUeYbMvLvUEFzaTuHo1LXf0TgqS5XJOBExymKkhipojxdHZ00QPd ss/4hK2UMBvKg==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 442323C03B4 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:56:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <210703000.13935.1600682181177@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxQQACJrSQnxLVr+G14hfzXDkYurk+V_YFVPWVOCS=fyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAChr6SxQQACJrSQnxLVr+G14hfzXDkYurk+V_YFVPWVOCS=fyQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13933_827605058.1600682181158"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev8
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/Snpjutwv58WTqahZ80vk3y1Fufg>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Status of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis?
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:56:27 -0000

>     Il 21/09/2020 08:20 Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
> 
>     Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org mailto:paul.hoffman@icann.org > wrote:
> 
>     > Greetings again. A document on which I am a co-author refers to
>     > draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis. As I was updating references in that
>     > draft, I thought that maybe draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis was done.
>     > However, according to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/,
>     > this draft's state has be "AD followup" for many months now.
>     >
>     > Is there something that the draft authors or the DPRIVE WG need to do to
>     > help move this forward?
> 
>     Other recent submissions have changed their references to RFC 7626. What changes in the 7626-bis document are important to you?
> 
To me, the question is different: the working group has put substantial effort into this document, for about two years. It even went to last call, receiving a single objection. I thought this meant that we had more or less reached rough consensus, but that single objection prompted several more months and several more revisions to address those objections and new objections that were added after those objections were solved. Ok, it's fine if we can make the document better, but at a certain point in time one would expect that the document gets finalized and published - there is always time to start working on further documents if needed. Instead, the document seems to be lost in a limbo forever. Honestly, this does not encourage people to commit their time and contribute.

--

Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy