Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] [Doh] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

[Christian Huitema <[e-mail]>]

On 3/12/2019 11:35 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:

> if someone is concerned that some of the web sites 
> reachable through some CDN are dangerous...


Paul, who is this someone? How do they decide? What does dangerous mean?
These questions are very much behind the tension we see today. And the
answers are not as black and white as "this is my network, I get to decide".

For example, users routinely delegate the filtering decision to some
kind of security software running on their device, often with support
from some cloud based service. They are making an explicit decision, and
often use menu options to decide what type of site is OK or not --
adults would probably not subscribe to parental control services. There
is a market for these products, they compete based on reputation, ease
of use, etc.

You are saying that whoever happens to control part of the network path
is entitled to override the user choices and impose their own. Really?
As Stephane wrote, that may be legit in some circumstances, but much
more questionable in others, such as a hotel Wi-Fi attempting to decide
what sites I could or could not access. It really is a tussle.

-- Christian Huitema