Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 31 March 2021 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D503A387D for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2uWcP_HXZGXP for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7FC3A3878 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id k8so74429iop.12 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3y7ekotC0L2XCuaCXyA5AwcBvici9fWfublUnkjKAh4=; b=DzwfoXVhzJt44UX53QGuLOBO9BzbdyaZL8ZR5+LvZznm6xA/Knigpl19wHuwOQzPFX UsXdytLeC/qh/xa368Dt5tCn8NcgRGfUlmCKWQ5Qo/AxEkUyhfW565fP0fOhI1cjAHf9 11GecBT74oKFkodT/FgpIdi91uBWF3JwUTrDl5Mb/ApFXvJAUffnEKWRzIaoG92ue9fo cBdiRtjP68geWokYhulXiWfrCnYfxDGoK5QLge8ExhT/Y2/KM/7gR1UeHLfzIE4NiKrH a2J2DGDlT4EszK2yVMZGcff32OzNa7zj8yRND7mdl8BM628S5s8BhFAk4JBzisQnuYBD SvqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3y7ekotC0L2XCuaCXyA5AwcBvici9fWfublUnkjKAh4=; b=SpqUeAluYB3CB3AP28LJMYlPixZSQjNJuqwRJjFDpEYDsZZyw+7W6kegmoujgJ6zLE +tBezyIx6Gzp+vzEUJLjiwIR28EAY8GznWKYF1w+/QmSA1Fm+Fgn9Ea/0wR0c55njC5k ZmRmB62UszzLV8gID+bC4NHABO6Yx4FaDijVifqd3/w2OIdu4mp8ORFhBVQKWp+36oRR D2BhacWMi6xHx04KYexLEqRfwr6P5bUcsSBfFM8ZUOphL8SfxR9Z8QFWdDp2ZpDo1ANg A/IOUJ/cqXyH/sm6YyR7psq+pV8ahRkOi9ZcXE27SjiVSM+EIjhbwnQasqZIhJkfR/ZW 20sA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S4wp0it9nmTmHuFWzuwUmKYpQ38HXQVpJoSxyQ2KfMmN2DIfO nl4gamf7O62DjaO0ofkb+VXeHK3qzdww7xV0mkyupb43Y+IeBA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4vzDwXAaNnz34xk0ZfkqmRrKMwh5CclXXbayTS+lc24sByFK1Syw5eBaNnzb2Ob217qeHa0iE65L+RWDQV+0=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9693:: with SMTP id m19mr3751737ion.46.1617227524039; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c925da9089fa4b1e991ec74fc9c11e7f@verisign.com> <CAChr6Sxwao=FAcoeHMuOf0L=JCZ+wvhsr9BNZW_dbt+1=HWQwg@mail.gmail.com> <20210331091238.GA10597@nic.fr> <CAChr6SxPNVAZMYfZqF+K6Xf8FPGa9ZgHkL-uUvtKMEiJSPmp8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2607D274-936F-4A31-9E4D-EEBCF45BE838@pch.net> <CAChr6Szg+EbFqSpFPco8Gyb9pzNNnrSoQJcXTDVeg40_EXiPDg@mail.gmail.com> <4B1CCB51-C777-4434-B28E-76C22C12E4DA@pch.net> <CAChr6Sym=tm-vj-3FB-GbOG6U=U4CFsRE6yyWJk14waZQLbRiQ@mail.gmail.com> <ABD711DE-80CE-4B15-9153-82DA25E4F000@pch.net> <CAChr6Swfnc_s_-3TS6NuCzuqWduA-E6270x4uSLNGnTF+sLnmQ@mail.gmail.com> <981FF900-A7ED-46DF-9DDB-056E76822017@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <981FF900-A7ED-46DF-9DDB-056E76822017@pch.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:51:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sw1j504KJV4OVmqWoDKP1EmO6aUnFRr40UyWARuuBWkdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001766b705bedc20fa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/UJrB-4tD6mlnlyidL0i3PxYq1DU>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:52:10 -0000

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:44 PM Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:

> > On Mar 31, 2021, at 11:39 PM, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think it's fine if you don't want to implement any given IETF RFC.
>
> Then those RFCs should be worded carefully so that they don’t suggest that
> the thing they’re proposing is generally applicable.  Particularly to the
> roots.  Which are actual critical infrastructure.
>

I think the IETF as a whole would get consensus on that issue.


> > Your business might be different--you know best there.
>
> Since when are root servers a “business?”
>

Look, this is just needlessly combative. There are plenty of senses of the
word that don't mean what you are implying here.


>
> We’re talking about critical infrastructure that everyone depends on.  Not
> some random person’s “business” that can fail or not fail.  This isn’t a
> place for pointless thrashing around as a byproduct of someone’s unrelated
> agenda.  Which was, I think, the point of the statement.
>

Plenty of people come to the IETF from different perspectives. I don't
consider DNSSEC to be critical, but I know some people do. That doesn't
upset me, or force me to implement it.

thanks,
Rob