IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-13.txt

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Mon, 13 July 2020 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBE83A0966 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sinodun.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xbt7BtQqcyN4 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5BA3A0E2A for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sinodun.com ; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:From:Subject; bh=Cvyszt71G43i4P2yl/m60ZwIyDYZGkbiCbJDijysDbs=; b=neG5dt/aKhZLhyOsGNSlpEpLjl uZOzuv+79TAYISNL8Yv7ffnNXuSba9VI/SOtZW312zcj5m5ugVHw4wOesHd3GJVQpaLInZHuGQ0xF JLm4VQOopgp8CS9DyG/qi/Cl4RFtQVC8HNQo/AvLL3OTTz8phgeggdz4j4Zxsx1J59x8K6gwqTTQh jaGBW4+7/m/1+0X+7/BISh5iWG+Cz8AXe4xq4WwOLhfr/yNvXpTnMDLk0Coj0+2YKKAbRO5s85Rrc 34v5PPrDJ9/ZkoTRdogkTozW6jPGDqCBwjgJsHlZC4VqgqH8fX6Ef4E+OJquPR8+OkofIcPSGMT/v v1qT3BKA==;
Received: from [2a02:8010:6126:0:c03c:414c:be06:e933] (port=60420) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1jusMd-0002Mw-Ua; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:55:04 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <56DB8897-63D8-4D57-83CC-F4D00BFAFFE6@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:54:55 +0100
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B18002AB-B653-4FAA-A071-E83C198E4577@sinodun.com>
References: <159437029269.4591.18164471996521591458@ietfa.amsl.com> <0875766C-6A62-4AC7-9C91-12E77B3A973B@sinodun.com> <20200711074741.GA6651@nic.fr> <56DB8897-63D8-4D57-83CC-F4D00BFAFFE6@cisco.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/VcAxGy0k43bngnL9PGqVr3K8sQ4>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-13.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 06:55:39 -0000


> On 13 Jul 2020, at 07:34, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Stéphane,
> 
> This is a little late in the process as the BCP has been approved last Thursday after IESG review ;-)
> 
> OTOH, this is editorial changes and do not change the core of the document.
> 
> So, I suggest to upload quickly a new revision before it goes in the RFC Editor queue (where those changes could still happen in AUTH48 state). You, Sara, and I are in European time zone, so, let's act quickly this Monday morning
> 

Done.

Sara. 


> -éric
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
> Organization: NIC France
> Date: Saturday, 11 July 2020 at 09:48
> To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
> Cc: DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-13.txt
> 
>    On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:41:07AM +0100,
>     Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote 
>     a message of 61 lines which said:
> 
>> This version should address the final comments from the IESG review.
> 
>    Some very small editorial details:
> 
>    Abstract "to assist writers of a Recursive operator Privacy statement"
>    Capital S, for the acronym.
> 
>    Section 1 "These open resolvers have tended" Rather "public resolvers"
>    to be consistent with the rest of the paragraph and with RFC 8499.
> 
>    Section 5.3.1 "Run a copy of the root zone on loopback [RFC7706]"
>    should now be written "Run a local copy of the root zone [RFC8806]".
> 
>    Appendix D.2 "Both POST and GET are supported" Can probably be deleted
>    since RFC 8484 says "DoH servers MUST implement both the POST and GET
>    methods."
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email