Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] A Few More Suggestions for the Requirements Draft

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

Hi Paul,

On 4/19/21 4:51 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 1:43 PM, Brian Haberman <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> The goal of the referenced work item is to ensure that the WG
>> participants agree on the requirements.
> 
> Great, but then we're back to the question of what are "requirements", particularly because the current draft has moved away from that.
> 

I agree that the current draft is not just about requirements. If I
recall, that came about because some WG participants pushed back on hard
requirements and really just wanted "design considerations".

My view, as a WG participant, is that we need to decide how we want to
use this document.

>> Having that be done in a draft
>> is far cleaner than relying on various people's recollections of
>> discussions.
> 
> Fully agree, if we can agree what the base is.
> 
>> If everyone goes back to the minutes of our session during IETF 110,
>> Benno explicitly told the WG that he is happy to work on a revision
>> *with WG input*. I view Scott's messages to the ML as being an attempt
>> to provide such feedback to the draft authors on what he sees as useful
>> changes to the draft. Scott's suggestions should be discussed to see
>> what suggestions have consensus.
> 
> That feels premature, given that we don't actually know what the document is supposed to be about.

Then let's start with a conversation about what the WG wants out of this
document. I'll start a separate thread for that.

Regards,
Brian