Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57983A07CE for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 05:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nRylkiR0lzrw for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 05:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CBF3A07CC for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 05:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284D26A28D; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1595334512; bh=voSfONaZR+anIdiNQ/xF8EUVn6KesGXiW0V/QHTuCi8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=b5Apcn46uINFwnGX2Rzcva4lRbaFlMYBLtclYv7kOu0PJ1oTEkVqkeYOaFpxPjiOt 7i2x0lckx3KugeP5lw62EtV487tvTmOAwmNA2fgtn9TlSqbRYjKc/JSLOJzVEYlmQZ NhabubIdnhXbstXCiX28GvyjmnMetg6kiYb5TB9hmwHXlyIfGo6W+VFgvxzClQsRod /OImwD83jSXW5+aDNnRGiam6eQ1ygPxwlWIWJ89Hqq5Nz2mCd8S1Xyk6fJI2zYQLub mdg284Ouso9tu3M51L7mqrZhxziZ6fNQwdj3w39x1nc0SrlvpJiws5rMmidSuIeRHq 5skFRAT8z6lpA==
Received: from appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A5143C02C7; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:28:31 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: "Z.W. Yan" <yan@cnnic.cn>
Cc: gggeng <gggeng@jnu.edu.cn>, "xincha.zhang" <xincha.zhang@gmail.com>, dns-privacy <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, liuyang7 <liuyang7@caict.ac.cn>
Message-ID: <1892275233.2222.1595334512009@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <202007210827523450885@cnnic.cn>
References: <2020071310175736721911@cnnic.cn>, <20200720192855.GA5670@nic.fr> <202007210827523450885@cnnic.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2220_760525365.1595334512000"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev17
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/YU611mRxilfRiKukFcjxnHMJqxg>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:28:36 -0000


>     Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan <yan@cnnic.cn> ha scritto:
>      
>      
>     Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct.
>     However, based on DHCP/ICMP is also an approach because the end-user is always bootstrapping based on DHCP/ICMP for the address configuration and so on.
>     Besides, the configuration of resolver can be supported by DHCP/ICMP and only an extension is needed based on RFC3646/4339...
> 
I think it makes sense to standardize Do* service discovery via DHCP, then people will decide whether they want to make use of it or not.

I would however note that this draft (subject to assessment by the WG chairs) might be more in topic for the ADD working group - you may want to post it there.

-- 

Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy