Re: [dns-privacy] Possible use case: Opportunistic encryption for recursive to authoritative

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 08 August 2020 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F563A03ED for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id le-X0Dip5Rl6 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A19AB3A03EC for <dprive@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id z6so3685109iow.6 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SS4P1li0Td8BAu2ZwuAhagD+dw4RX4ZlG/ldXWSriIU=; b=brdiX20fs9i2RGZvpr0tX87hEdi1nkeZf1N0sDpw5J03Ijfm5h00t2XDnjFkQgre7M 7dcmRyF7gxjW9uNfcVyfi7nPis0v99PDngAUzc2uDrfLyn99KGlbsqOE6X8utCLTp93r RyJJ/eF9WX5QsUTVPP+ZALdBsdR+Te3jDfL6nfrnLB6WKEp20eVOXK2vb4y1Bl4xpYHQ eMgrPMi1+897K91gFqjxL84tzwWTlWw3nVm5h9kRAPDpLLSiX2ARCEVtLuEc4px8Aryn o01ieXa18z9lELvUhQYGKT2B7S5Z/n8V1ku2NGmnxyRX7NIrXhsGv0WuIuP8WlWOlduW pBog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SS4P1li0Td8BAu2ZwuAhagD+dw4RX4ZlG/ldXWSriIU=; b=Vv7GHGrn0iKQ59lHpeH6eaaHiH7yHyBkrjy/CjBx2wRbudeQ/9JNjUNd3mYKTWhoCl yG9x6JFhEIkppCAifReQ2VZh1d4Qlozo48VyNDMlWh6RKRNoKirZMn8d3P9KKtsUZkFZ NI7N3FPJwv3B+QHJe1TGU1k3Yi3T3uHmwy9DIaSPFL5bGjdPtBUvYV+SDn8uhAPW3V9P SV18RI5Cnx/auioFIEJ9I9IoThZ3qXpOGWLpeA332SSBS8v7JWYu7604cVmtJZ5ysima 5aFSATvc8WaOzzataTyc4k41SbDSPpzvTnp07Sosc9pGGN9s3TLGVjQC7hyPbkZw/ATW 38Qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jMH5rZXkjXjWJIGh1Eq/ueZaVCW0VXHnvtizvLylBcxhoeXA9 UPBAPgaS6VcgU+qyQD/5ZwZ9x/JVo9r/z/djY11AOvqh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDcSTwAb6p2V//g3xF+sRai/BdG3gTcymFXIP5cF20msVyrZHkonNt+55C5zQmtHx5g+b79KL5PGx+icMGvJQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:84c1:: with SMTP id f59mr7998271jai.106.1596849724761; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3BA75997-3DE4-4DF5-B1F5-C57DBC423288@icann.org> <CA+9_gVvMWeZyWv3cXgtZwO6xhwNykPN85iadnGPHFkJ3ngqafg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9_gVvMWeZyWv3cXgtZwO6xhwNykPN85iadnGPHFkJ3ngqafg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:21:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sz8psTwmnkE6SJrCyG3TXXQcpO=mg2g6f6zk02Y-LZc+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Puneet Sood <puneets=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009aaa5d05ac538cbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/YbVkhllRTQXTit2_1DPknwStbq8>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Possible use case: Opportunistic encryption for recursive to authoritative
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 01:22:07 -0000

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:18 PM Puneet Sood <puneets=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I think this is worth doing.
>

I agree. The part that I worry about is the computational cost of
reestablishing links after an outage. Is there a way to model this?
(Perhaps this work has already been done)

thanks,
Rob