Re: [dns-privacy] Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-04.txt>

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Mon, 20 January 2020 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3054120829; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:47:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ggbXjVW+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Lk4Ui46Q
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zm-diVE3Fvoq; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18CD9120232; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:47:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1582; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1579556841; x=1580766441; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=P90Pztu1YvsgrxXf7o5YfGyyJmzbaCm0vb854lan1vo=; b=ggbXjVW+zcfYoiryI5rkcZOJpftwCwwRgGFc6xgx/Ra4y1+3FYZwCeSb OSHIsTFWhN7Sg5trv/YaH67Tel7Fv/yGHS7XUXVsTcPmkQ5taCVIl3JJi 9BtpiXjoqAKT2jY+ymqiD0Kj9KQiDpymXpKrBKwYjJ5HGiDmSYv5iL5vp I=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A6Ls2ixbpnKKSJkWJQdUCTd7/LSx94ef9IxIV55?= =?us-ascii?q?w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20gebRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn?= =?us-ascii?q?1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavncT08F8dPfFRk5Hq8d0NSHZW2ag=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BYCADEHiZe/4gNJK1lHQEBAQkBEQU?= =?us-ascii?q?FAYF7gVRQBWxYIAQLKgqECINGA4sAmm2CUgNUCQEBAQwBASMKAgEBhEACF4F?= =?us-ascii?q?4JDgTAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwELhV8CAQMSEREMAQEjFAEPAgEIGgImAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?CMBUQAgQOBSKDBAGCSgMuAQMLoWECgTmIYXWBMoJ/AQEFgUNBgwQYggwDBoE?= =?us-ascii?q?OKowUGoFBP4ERJyCCTD6CZAIDAYFfF4J5MoIskFWfAQqCOYc9iW+FBRuCRzC?= =?us-ascii?q?YAI5egUmHGJIlAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBVlAYJBUBgNiAGDc4UUhT90gSm?= =?us-ascii?q?LTgGBDwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,343,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="691425330"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Jan 2020 21:47:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00KLlJXu018406 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:47:19 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:47:18 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:47:17 -0600
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:47:17 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=f97q9hJ9tShzXJst+HVn+h7/HJQuR2h3mcU/7GHgt99fTpOXjh+7jaG8zLACIPAF8YUFDSqcWLRNwIpIP6w5ziqqJ7AlZBVv6hwS+DVLtFolnwh5xGrwDLMZ4tBt8OnSHASUB+JyxOEu9v6otjC7Rd7OveAU1dqEWjPvPzCh9UVXq8djvyLoH+e69x2MA5wFH+cfGteuN3aJxA3MP5ynGgXVdFfiUrpNnMfxAnW0HBJdchoiGfwgq+SF1y/4VWdROCj+HDitpdRw2YdbUR7abolRAz+9tlqhAzdxBeBuAdnl9fUhaddabwFtpP86FJE9LP6wRhPuyPpePQZTyykxSQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=P90Pztu1YvsgrxXf7o5YfGyyJmzbaCm0vb854lan1vo=; b=aR1VwfQb/PDrrH/GbifZ9KQXBgx2i+ojtxaY+LIsC0QEbb+lLAB0lHplhvbPOXF4pvBtqd7wD/cNXhqicS65jRJoxwC0WLL+RsXc13gf95j0YO6/kULcdlKueEIglIal2KjyM6jA7D2FaRk7x+l48uOS76h5+DQxEzvOdxoG+5DHgZZK/mN9pZsj/3puMfSXiUX1yMahxP7wBENiq4cN7aIWM5HFPfPu4VnHODDmh2Oftb0bQJl20WOa6RemGEmRfFmlrxjfBx1/orngLPf97VgtPHSrAcKWFVaiZAUUqJuDmsAkJc2VW5MJ9q91Mt4nN52GeFmYABR1iACMiXDfNg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=P90Pztu1YvsgrxXf7o5YfGyyJmzbaCm0vb854lan1vo=; b=Lk4Ui46QLBv6/LLCHKprY/x1gs+LSN6dv8+DlwcMSQp87g+x2eBv+uVIJO4zEJT/ktPqtkYNrvyhmQCZNE1Mzd919K/r/9lOv/2c2foDQW7ewd8ZoaxnGL+dwa0AYWo8iLthxhEu6uPXOe29hwlFwDM8EGs7TtAZXuSbCnYpfvs=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.88.141) by DM5PR11MB1451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:45:08 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9528:bb7a:843e:5ea3]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9528:bb7a:843e:5ea3%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.026; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:45:08 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
CC: "dprive-chairs@ietf.org" <dprive-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-04.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHVz9l2IkHylwdJHkyHgVgzxDbed6f0JtOA
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:45:08 +0000
Message-ID: <417BE033-4DE5-452A-BE93-0657C83051BC@cisco.com>
References: <157955609351.1744.15099511006231348523.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157955609351.1744.15099511006231348523.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [37.71.174.134]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2bdf847d-59c7-4a83-298e-08d79df204ee
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1451:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB1451FAF12BD4888B59ED479AA9320@DM5PR11MB1451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0288CD37D9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(189003)(199004)(6506007)(26005)(966005)(186003)(498600001)(36756003)(4326008)(6512007)(450100002)(2616005)(8936002)(81166006)(6916009)(2906002)(86362001)(5660300002)(8676002)(6486002)(81156014)(54906003)(91956017)(71200400001)(66946007)(66476007)(64756008)(66556008)(76116006)(66446008)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1451; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D79D27A2A1B75D45BE36DA96A1C7CFD4@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2bdf847d-59c7-4a83-298e-08d79df204ee
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jan 2020 21:45:08.4538 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +WEAFdBQkpxGapN/5zpRbV4KIYEidLeaAbc7YWaWr9g/puN1RBKm/bzd9ZMk49ACLbe57tNgQG3dTxx9Xloy3A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1451
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/bgEJpeQNRYpOt2ny8Uqx4dzJaok>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-04.txt>
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:47:24 -0000

Thanks to Sara and Stéphane for the -04 revised I-D. 

After reading the -04, I think that most of the IETF Last Call comments are addressed (and consensus needs to be balanced -- even for informational document) and that the document sticks to facts.

But, as section 3.5.1 ("in the recursive resolvers") raised a lot of discussions during the first IETF Last Call, and as the authors reacted to those comments by deep changes in the text, let's have a new IETF Last Call before proceeding with IESG evaluation.

Again, thank you to the reviewers and the authors

Regards,

-éric


On 20/01/2020, 22:34, "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:

    IESG state changed:
    
    New State: Last Call Requested
    
    (The previous state was Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup)
    
    The previous last call raised several points. The authors have worked on those points and this new informational IETF draft has substantive changes; enough to go trigger a new IETF Last Call.
    
    -éric
    
    Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/