Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 10 August 2020 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099703A07B5 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOT4fponnk2J for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08AB3A07A5 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 07AFsGv0024465 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:54:16 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.595.3; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:54:15 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0595.003; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:54:15 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
CC: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [dns-privacy] Call for adoption: draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin
Thread-Index: AQHWbwuTaIjHjrLDtkWFAXguyNzPY6kx9D8A
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:54:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BC07702D-682F-4B14-AAF2-87F8F94E2B38@icann.org>
References: <4b3271ee-e796-3102-1ead-d1f9a3137514@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <4b3271ee-e796-3102-1ead-d1f9a3137514@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B8176C3B-78ED-45F4-A8D5-13FEC6500FC2"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-10_12:2020-08-06, 2020-08-10 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/c3RBJV6yzV-WfdoKAHvAVX6oHQ0>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:54:20 -0000

I oppose adopting this draft at this time. There seemed to be interest in the WG to focus on use cases first, and this draft is an instantiation of an use case that is not clearly identified. Once that use case is identified, the WG can decide whether this draft is a good potential solution for the use case.

FWIW, I could certainly believe that I would support this draft later, after the use case is clarified and other ideas for that use case are bounced around.

--Paul Hoffman