IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Fwd: New draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and draft-pp-dprive-common-features

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 26 May 2021 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403D73A1826 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ackIKGzotXuW for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE503A1823 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id k4so26265276ili.4 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y8EoKzKA/uoWipBANAqip3ZnBiOmXY79N8wp3MAOql0=; b=X3AInTe6MjtLO3LaoaZPEM2GdcFFfclKR5I5O8/RT1l210RBR5jI3s/w2pAsjDcrL8 mCO140FeR2KeNiBeLw7c4pZMU4t5Mk0fab+oTnIVYZXTWzRQQkJ9SE0qx6kStEVnPe29 ecK7t2yzyrMnj4cz0zQSd2Ti30XXGk7EBCQ2GqhBMAj6w2lIfFNZSXYsWyfgdPgT4vZ4 cxWLrazs48bYLZrxnqBbXK9w5g5Yx7G4nDxNQkH5jHMXgeBvyuPIOw+nWwFoKuKhacEQ mc/Qi6UkjXI5iORJnSiCpViIroX9ar+N3mk8Z5gXnAnGQ8aacqQf530vuV8Ld6Yv/052 W5Uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y8EoKzKA/uoWipBANAqip3ZnBiOmXY79N8wp3MAOql0=; b=qwQJA1kP9U+JhocawKmR++anws27Vi52zUNVNOdg96+J0psYhLghBRX6d5y65lfBVa AIM3Dlatv/d02zAA73fopbwEwwiE1BiML32Q03EqQYxSan37lTKK2cIb+NmcLzbYjyAD MMxSWfT2hySZi+CfeL0vRuzLsRhapT45gzcaUvEIwZzQsTwzhv/DqjBnYzMqfZ3OHxfj KkEirLAQUig4/TkeGS7aoNcGn59LjLQvZMU2orvpZ0SevGlCr9nF8LaSZv9QK5Fq8X79 HdKbb7BadUlZ4H7LjA/cPx9crYHjpHP8TwBMogpu9UYwrOcnauzVoEbmavamp1ltJkwR YweQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dS/RLLSYSF6/MAe6NMNjR5YKXDlEKe9QdaOXdqwK5mC0B/JCs /8t7Z57qzztPfqj1DhfocJfxneuN/+hsnIQhhZNeGUF/84r/Cw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyTOlUFuBxrD5JSgrOc8d9bL1rjFSX7yfAHkS9EC4l5xc2pgZtNVg72AcedCOK7xlgmq5ZQLfg1XZZ8x1EDWM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:b:: with SMTP id h11mr24325882ilr.18.1621993437946; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+E9jpV0BwMsaS8=vNbs7x87d4qqGbKQevj8MVGCLGyv5w@mail.gmail.com> <21CD5432-D523-4316-A5D0-E5ECA4D84F7E@nohats.ca> <CABcZeBM+zng4vTXwgTH328O-LPy9VLGPOrGK_UWtiXGQCYeZzw@mail.gmail.com> <3761A6B3-A53F-4B63-8F7A-FA2B3F474FF3@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <3761A6B3-A53F-4B63-8F7A-FA2B3F474FF3@icann.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 18:43:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPVJs_6fgSXwJhLn4QohVNh6pPX=3SE=8KGyoorft7F4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b27bf205c331c6e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/c8xdMnj7GrM9OLd4Pt-pX52Gezc>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Fwd: New draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and draft-pp-dprive-common-features
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 01:44:04 -0000

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:17 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> On May 25, 2021, at 5:09 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> > The fundamental question here is whether we want to build a mechanism
> for authenticated ADoX or not
>
> It might be better to think of this as "whether we want to build a
> mechanism for fully-authenticated ADoX now, but if not now, allow for it to
> be done easily in the future". Others on the list have already said that
> they are interested in unauthenticated as a stepping stone to later going
> to full authentication.
>
> The purpose of the proposed -common-features draft is to make such
> fully-authenticated mechanism(s) easily definable regardless of when the WG
> wants to do so.
>

I understand your motivation, but I think in this case it is misguided. The
controversial parts of fully authenticated are precisely the signaling
mechanisms in draft-rescorla-dprive-adox that you are attempting to pull
out here. If those are acceptable, then authenticated is comparatively easy.

-Ekr


> --Paul Hoffman_______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email