Re: [dns-privacy] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-04.txt> (DNS Privacy Considerations) to Informational RFC

[Bob Harold <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 6:01 PM The IESG <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> The IESG has received a request from the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG (dprive)
> to
> consider the following document: - 'DNS Privacy Considerations'
>   <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-04.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2020-02-03. Exceptionally, comments
> may
> be sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>    This document describes the privacy issues associated with the use of
>    the DNS by Internet users.  It is intended to be an analysis of the
>    present situation and does not prescribe solutions.  This document
>    obsoletes RFC 7626.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
Looks good to me.  One grammar nit:

3.5.1.4.2.  DoH Specific Considerations
next to last paragraph
"Some implementations have, in fact, chosen restrict the use of"
change to:
"Some implementations have, in fact, chosen to restrict the use of"

-- 
Bob Harold