IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC...

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 18 August 2016 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893C12D633 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vvu7G_nmDul for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40B912D5E8 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x25so2429010qtx.2 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/7b5MXo0kH1SP+TNK/1dvfppHZO19hT2Vvr059fDWnw=; b=ODKtpvAHilXQ9rI27zVhv55ntuTMKFYly37u8paH/DK18+4aCxkIiGNY53ev3LG6TL +WMnG1d1kU/irR0o5MaXIx8ukiJ8GuezHou6FIHWQKofwbSS+DYwTA4VE814O93RvsP1 IRwpN21jI7e3LjUS8qhUF9O7zhnKxAWeA1EVTTTRya3maAPVheQi+od9gmpcnFTmAYyn YdzXhNRCQ0g+D0sGNyg/fFWxbR7H0K//TdiOGRe6ycwZbuF7+9VDbaLZ3fPLojjLk3Jk YNRAxOuVj+cA0HvXz0trvNRes1bh77m0cKrsseFHZFIMZnP17fTL4SKO4pYo0EHjqUgJ /BWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/7b5MXo0kH1SP+TNK/1dvfppHZO19hT2Vvr059fDWnw=; b=BGoEDQWQnPr9/OWA4kFBrEE98QzBcFOKTZ6CcItig9XaXrqj+4bh/IAST2mRQLIY50 sLoX6s2IpZx0GkcGgWQ7LYyOsQC0M6glYYrXG77ciifVDgtOY1mlsE4saQ9EV7avz+oV 6xuBDYOkZvEvErq+oTZFNpLeRA7+EvzQjiBs4RuBxnwhiRx6nuBgBMdDHNWJm3xYqMdS gNNE6GYgw+imAN4jokobvauypoesmEAJauyvk5PHWLML7EfX3tpoz6xIUHJiXTXyENTl XzDUXo0el7Hrig0LSCRqK9G3O7v+jCiWlK190eVmXPAfZ4SxqGkY4MhGJKYX3Q0yMDkb TDVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutBSgkBft8QdbnFpF7nx0uEgrSL4YUlHf6PDWEH8RtN5GWCWdLMPvkxvLj5eIh88OErJF/fR5Co8frdBu7s
X-Received: by 10.237.43.162 with SMTP id e31mr5000764qtd.110.1471553319931; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.176.199 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+SuHgKUtbjTVYZBLeWMofQ0FkLM7eiw25bJPq44pY75Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iLjE5Yf28xH_Qy8nOCiyu-Q3fGxF6iQWm-OuXJSbjrRhA@mail.gmail.com> <27C92EFC-CB09-443F-A167-6E5A07E45B14@vpnc.org> <1471540514.3032.2.camel@env.dtu.dk> <5512479A-CCA6-42A5-9A81-178C899183EA@isoc.org> <CAHw9_i+SuHgKUtbjTVYZBLeWMofQ0FkLM7eiw25bJPq44pY75Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:48:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iK6y-wWEBhf_5_29SpnJcWb0omVP4vdfrvfpiyyGjRkvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/cUPYJcYLaP0hkKHYrUMm6D5zAys>
Cc: Hugo Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC...
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:48:43 -0000

Oh. And the obligatory reminder to review and comment on
draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls - it's here (for easy clickin') :
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/

W

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> Great.
>
> I just put in the session request...
>
> W
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Hugo Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 09:06 -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Aug 2016, at 10:08, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>>
>> At the moment we are expecting to meet  in Seoul, partly to discuss
>> the Profiles document, but also as a “BoF style” discussion on the
>> Phase 2 work.
>>
>> Thoughts? Views? etc.
>>
>> A BoFy kind of discussion about recursive-to-authoritative would be
>> very
>> useful. The privacy advantages are obvious, but the various types of
>> costs are important too.
>> --Paul Hoffman
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> +1. Agree this discussion would be useful.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan York
>> Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society
>> york@isoc.org   +1-802-735-1624
>> Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org
>> Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork
>>
>> http://www.internetsociety.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dns-privacy mailing list
>> dns-privacy@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email