IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Fri, 19 March 2021 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7333A1477 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jswQl3SUA9Vi for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01B73A1475 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id t6so9559115ilp.11 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Z/o+4v5gLQMZ23sAWS30QMIOgWuE5OrYu/LhPYBmp8c=; b=OMDldyA1hkgF8ZM6CHKnwz6b47BfwRVY8+dkofA+HTT7nIy7JTC8GNQXtpe/0/wzkQ gT+xI6LYq7y/5+aSAQvnokPeXx+FBqmoine4jsF8qfqOVNT2821YbB1pO6tV7Oy7CIWz UesHLOHWabu0W94S7P1Jdj/6fTdQrUA5xde7tpDfgQZI3sYzh4YAJogkoP8YDIWmhnsS XzjoGkCLtGDgr3PWDW6Ql7kRtb7+EmdR7bFrAINUCrskkWARxpt4sRNsITe3+flFrmdD Wv7L4xbm1hr8uThmpICUPcVlCM3EFYvzDILiOku/6lbEjLugBw/7y/vFIHXfYVRGMnBd +sZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z/o+4v5gLQMZ23sAWS30QMIOgWuE5OrYu/LhPYBmp8c=; b=Zj5KO1qpDl9eA61Kj4qCTmjKAlxnyrBV/8dlpTiB/FDLBdD3I0mSHsksmxvdoXLoqT re0C6BXHdr4HPkxOY7Vqmkq8jzhI4DDdkCULKUFe4gkpbf5CHZ/tcSII41CrfInmu7H8 3/B0yPAWsAiVWhDosr10axQ9vvC+h0GTvYEOqoli/PwmSCk+9tkY7+u5Lm2oRBkX7Y61 DykfOqslafWmROpB96wNTIrzqBduDkFaVg0PoO7xdvtOdcara8rHX9At49zzSJ6cinJN F+rxFTHZmyeDPbVr2RbuAnCSLI9ygeeH9DSNLqDmKJ52KyFgpAmiIU3gpLyYpYEzCRWE B5wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SbzuFgcYWUHongbfm3cFIMUlpvpw4VWTCIE0KYCE/R2Pifywk A+IVno6gGAvb3ZNO+Sp8JwiZbF4+7b5byVwpClCcqeYDOpyh4A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpYdDJmmbul0VfYZyfuXDHRQS0bHC283RVKSHCA+52Q9UxF8AdKM1oPJkzdqAjVj3J+erJssyyggb82kVQ69s=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:58b:: with SMTP id c11mr4458494ils.49.1616198368073; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net> <3c1794d0-bc1f-42ed-a881-4c40676715db@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBMG9tJjngMa0sbvY212a4Gbz6dKO7ZfZamCeXfOQyNWrQ@mail.gmail.com> <8156895c-adb2-4fc6-8407-6d7c6ded0823@www.fastmail.com> <yblh7l7cksr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <yblh7l7cksr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:59:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwuKAB2PEb9HY0NpNLW69yO67BmcivmGCG2tYGsogjCGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d9bf705bdec81b1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/dvfVCrTdOFHT0YjJoGBSMWrPK40>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 23:59:31 -0000

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:32 PM Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:

>
> It seems silly to me to write up a document that is decoupled from the
> parallel O-HTTP work when it would be better off depending on the
> results of that work.
>

It seems like the authors of ODoH and O-HTTP could resolve this
discrepancy, but I do agree it is a little unclear. One author is on both
documents, after all.

If someone is going to ship ODoH before O-HTTP is done, and they should be
coalesced, then an Informational RFC seems good.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email