Re: [dns-privacy] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 May 2021 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F4B3A0B15; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hn_CQVJxKA44; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2CA3A0B07; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id n32-20020a9d1ea30000b02902a53d6ad4bdso670552otn.3; Tue, 04 May 2021 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WS3ekn6UCHTEI/OGdVRSnJHxDrgE0XzaT/oAYL5bLFk=; b=T8+ZbCZK6aESWjTB9KV2VhMtWEyklCi0mujhBlSGFEavzvDrKqb23W7MGIkdsqP0ap 6p8isjJduL66ym2LyWtltg6bM417GKK9KdocQ/fJ+qbq2mK8+z1mWKVMi7pp1NavBjt+ W36ISQZ0U5S3LZlofMa1vC86AJB+Mou3W4m+u879/Jl0haRbYLGaEFl7G8HdCVLx5hnW ZUWck33FtVCz7JzUXR+v0Nl7cIc9b/PNuwv9ABJArHDgvZQsu5g/tT96uZGzv/4hj/RX WyR/qdBah883Vj/Kf726JlmYzNxcbn9MCyMcxoMT0K543s5ThU8bbLjguG22NOK+oFZH bafg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WS3ekn6UCHTEI/OGdVRSnJHxDrgE0XzaT/oAYL5bLFk=; b=KUEDWznNGPJHg/E5XvnPM7UO8HL+Ms2EtWEjVnulv1Kc7F+8KIdnF+T1BaQCkvszfJ CvXQ9KF9EnkaKZr4RWjXouMmGWJ5lMTnOaH7/J9qcz2ABBBrCLIKvhj4ZKAV0Hbznp81 Vbm/8JcHfJrwsr2SvNVm1O6cRy9aTkLjbUThdcSAAJI6tcX3tFIQEKCIoaavf+sgZGNN z1G09e6F85m5AncMF5nxTTaBKBOBJ08J2Wsi0/83uZpbeMkBhKPSnWuutH3ikjhZa9P7 dgYzDznK8t/LxA8ryZ+NwVlc/8fzAYsxz7Tr+EagH1sJzgYuQ6XuIFjlLbRVaTHnD6n+ C4ZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qo9KobqsifrlL6g8QHAEgxkSugh26CdtFrGLfmt/NN+rXCi4x evbNy/KFi2mVm11rYmDX68L9pVCWk5I5jTidc9I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrotq4qN5EUztitnws5PqNXHAAezvJds6W9wuTTf56E9E6503ZFuk2n4ZJFjZVvutoz+fsWZ0rMuVjyDXshR0=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1d01:: with SMTP id m1mr1806155otm.155.1620190766068; Tue, 04 May 2021 21:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162006706040.3639.6179900042922096790@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALUxDspOEaSGnUdhh2ASFp6wOc66pdEy+kdRQudgw0EG-C3K9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxQNyY+pZb-Dw7grKneULGfwjt5pV5GLjBsH9hf_Jp=yAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriWemNKoV_COKkE-tUgrW0Dqvk5UDCLmjNB0Bm3meWvSzQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210505044217.GY79563@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20210505044217.GY79563@kduck.mit.edu>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 21:59:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMGpriUUXnWke_WQcrU-Pjp7q_xgE=kvomjyBvq3nF_YqnxshA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Allison Mankin <amankin@salesforce.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001474e705c18e0fa4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/fvc_GdtekfPljV3F4VL3AeZf2Vo>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 04:59:33 -0000

Ah, I see!  It wasn't requested through a document's IANA section.  That
makes more sense.

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:42 PM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> I found it easily, but only because I saw the original and thus knew where
> to look:
>
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/JHoSPXIITFZx43PePWu2Kw-yAOs/
> et seq.
>
> -Ben
>
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:33:03PM -0700, Erik Kline wrote:
> > When I went to go find where the "dot" ALPN came from I couldn't find it
> > easily.
> >
> > The IANA registry said 7858, but when we did DoT for Android I didn't
> > remember any ALPN text, and I couldn't find it in 7858.  Nor could I find
> > it in 8310.  Perhaps I just wasn't paying close enough attention.
>