[dns-privacy] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9076 (8024)

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org> Tue, 09 July 2024 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@mukund.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3930C23D146 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 00:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AB-GsBgHyxuJ for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 00:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.mukund.org (mx.mukund.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13a:28c1:1::d8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021A1C1E0D9C for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 00:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 15:47:37 +0800
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZozrGZKfvA3JwP24@w2>
References: <20240709061843.5C46E7FA60@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org> <PH0PR11MB496618AD094E970FE18F39BEA9DB2@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB496618AD094E970FE18F39BEA9DB2@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID-Hash: FC7ELU536DMDJ47IKF25EFVPXUVCTAV7
X-Message-ID-Hash: FC7ELU536DMDJ47IKF25EFVPXUVCTAV7
X-MailFrom: muks@mukund.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dns-privacy.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "gregchoules+rfc@googlemail.com" <gregchoules+rfc@googlemail.com>, "tjw.ietf@gmail.com" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [dns-privacy] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9076 (8024)
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/g7zQILgKxakl6V_qCq0djL84BjA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dns-privacy-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dns-privacy-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dns-privacy-leave@ietf.org>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 07:08:01AM +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> Original Text
> -------------
> Primary request:
> This is the domain name in the URL that the user typed, selected
> from a bookmark, or chose
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Primary request:
> This is the domain name in the URL that the user typed, selected
> from a bookmark, or chosen

Both of you appear correct in my reading. It depends on how you read the
sentence.

This is the domain name... selected from a bookmark or chosen..

This is ... that the user selected from a bookmark or chose..

		Mukund