Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA251200C1; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3383q-bCzwX2; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BE7D120024; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id b136so33801391iof.3; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=f88UBiebMdUoMaKEQZac8eOS/KJb8lqZ9KYF8FSYnaw=; b=kn8wygX7RO8qTg19zfAAJkDiPU0zRJreaxp3tWGeBE8emoXq0Jw2Tn9UesWlNDkemM FtiFvYi/49qyY+8aMnCbP/sLzn4QtuYBtJACOajuF0O0wcDFUaGC66R3nFec4HyyS8qG jwE6xZSs33KSVk1WaMOf4kFQza0LNiw4AUMn5qsiIn/KEPpowlChSjW6ZWemGWariLfk wincZqVmsjn/qpIQtb5EvuX99x6nzAaa09/t57p5LeXFUS6yJOx8DwZthWEH3djabkth ExwCTJi+LBKpTTS3ml2AhvftdgS6jY8nqQFPbwgPSxx94vaY6+KdwDxO5+DoZkzibhOc 85bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f88UBiebMdUoMaKEQZac8eOS/KJb8lqZ9KYF8FSYnaw=; b=oKaExANbRa4sSgQL6Y5vC3iljtdHhWBt1BnSYwxf52sg9v9VqTW0R5MkEEat/0ePZo BIoYPrcSLopPzE6ivHz/NhPd4pUVIJy+kZUwkh5vmyWEgzuuB9VGV4xOizV3K0iMfAyb 78WTZNojR45v6baojIaK0ql2wX9hP3uy+o+Sv4i7h4qGATFqryY+2RG2vHWuPbTgZEJ1 08S1RLy55lYVv7y+6I2l5VqxkgAocGondvpsORisWghc//dkJPGDYpEtGS7i1VfugHRp 4V8W9a78k988a8Euhle/p2mNNbdO3v4c0nWozymdsBk8WZohBIzqw4Y17gjeoOr7K20P qs4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUkem9FAfkilhLw6qjfaxt1XmKWNyAQhAK0l5uTZYjsHndPljPs zDSe+HoKqlli5tnDE+EZi1fq79czTcKWiLWnB0c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwaqTmxbjsHTeOyMkFnEhYlnr/gdjqG7pK1kUMc6nZXPxMXIpdWp77CCXq0OPGQXnq2RJpHxV1o0YCIBtnCu5E=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d812:: with SMTP id y18mr3913259iob.73.1568079741513; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <402781F4-33D8-4FD4-8087-FDCEFFF2D549@iseclab.org> <CAChr6SwBKOymQjKsN+GEnygn5ogJb6WUMd=jxRrV2eQWwdiBcg@mail.gmail.com> <267CBE74-9DC5-40D8-A61F-7C566644A1CB@iseclab.org>
In-Reply-To: <267CBE74-9DC5-40D8-A61F-7C566644A1CB@iseclab.org>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:42:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sw1c=VvtAvf+9C_bTYXsQechZDDzLrqtx8ybfW-pSW9ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org>
Cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, jordanah@princeton.edu, pschmitt@cs.princeton.edu, ahounsel@cs.princeton.edu, feamster@uchicago.edu, dns-privacy@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8f20205922903e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/iVe_7alOAnmQUH9CGLczbVAu7tU>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:42:24 -0000

Hello,

Was the source code behind this study published?

It seems like it shouldn't be too much effort. After all, the study is
already published, so the code can't be changed.

thanks,
Rob


On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:42 PM Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org>; wrote:

>
> > This paper looks interesting. Is the software used in the paper
> published?
>
> Thanks! The code isn’t open source yet, but we will make it public
> alongside the Docker setup we used for running it. Not sure when that is
> going to happen exactly though.
>
> > Or, at least, is the test page set published? I haven't read the whole
> thing yet, but it seems like the page set would be relevant if the paper
> tests page load time.
>
> The list of websites is attached. It is extracted from the top 1,000 and
> 99,000 to 100,000 of a Tranco list.
>
> Best,
> Kevin
>
>