IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Revised opportunistic encryption draft

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 18 November 2020 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C7B3A0C00 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:01:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0q6wx2wV4bfl for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FED03A0B68 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CbmGy5r5lz23X; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:01:30 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1605711690; bh=dCPh0SlWTmIIOt0wzJNcRftnbjpp0PBulbDsg92RjkY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=gzWOtt8x10JojYm96FCGT9Db0fzFb90G7lDiTBO28Wm5agpaE+pr0mj3a5oLXQBPA R9vfe6mXdeJ8oxsriW9GTVT/12iuQ+D8I3fS3HuAj2O3dMlf8Uw12m29BHpxLtorNE bGKGolCR0TnJ7CtDodT70K1ubokzw9DtYAp/a/2c=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-lpKBLY1gHR; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:01:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:01:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B16896020F26; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:01:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92B9384C9; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:01:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:01:28 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
cc: "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011172300480.9850@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2011180957260.3144547@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <C0CBEBC5-D28A-46C0-AE50-078710015466@icann.org> <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2010301202350.2587497@bofh.nohats.ca> <2444B21B-9465-4A5B-97CC-AF809309300A@icann.org> <CABcZeBPZFY9aQ5Nb0q_4uTMFRbY3-S2rus4vaeLaUmvU+h_ftg@mail.gmail.com> <2D07CBD0-30CE-418E-AD05-02E0A5EDB79F@icann.org> <CABcZeBNdNnyjzk0mOtfix=OvVTEpPzegEw_V5QfKvYtkFV+zOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirz27EoahrYE8z9AV=Cf=A-i=iPP1deOYPWO8_k1mL+XA@mail.gmail.com> <27ddd3bde1ea11c857a96346b6f4ba5aa8b1d92f.camel@powerdns.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011172300480.9850@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/irH_8lBM4z8umvoyfltzPfnmyXo>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Revised opportunistic encryption draft
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:01:46 -0000

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Tony Finch wrote:

> Any serious attempt at improving delegations needs to deal convincingly
> with the quesion of why support for CDS, CDNSKEY, and CSYNC is so
> appallingly bad.

Because IETF does not enforce sunsets of old stuff. The market has no
strong reason to move to support this new stuff, as there is a first
mover disadvantage with too many players. Look at Cloudflare, who is
very willing to do all these new things, and they are stuck with old
software/people at (sub)Registrars and Registries.

This is also why DNSSEC is not ubiquitous.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email