Re: [dns-privacy] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Fri, 10 January 2020 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE72C1202A0; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:45:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=qLVRC34i; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ZWj4HZ2J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CNII5HmCZyU; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 225541200A3; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5815D63B; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:45:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 21:45:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=9E h1lYBB/V05/KTrzJgIcKPvD2SJteaMzSncvqwkmiY=; b=qLVRC34iCf3tgrxi81 vOhmDJFWrj3naKsjR8jTObon8H9lNTfs8o2WJ5zbmZdjYCKbDai36IYFsDoZp96m o06B2RFii4THfeqwrRM0skXovmKgSEVyWmOfccV8SwFeaZ36nND/guhnz8+/xmb7 UXlWp8OAWcP2+Noe58QVlIKHdvX/jTlQoQIa3ulECEv1CE+Sf70ANAgAlIRyt+AJ doTqjUl48B+JiGAnhj+8Teqtd3gavnjMSLcOFAk+HxjHkMFiVV0YrUPjirb6EGnl mEiNc++jMqPylymuXGdHCUfDTyp9ESlaWvG5x25di12FZKokmqOCg6go38KDcJY3 Y0hg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9Eh1lYBB/V05/KTrzJgIcKPvD2SJteaMzSncvqwkm iY=; b=ZWj4HZ2JOEN8zGIX8bn5rdEBH6iSG8WdEar730kveNBUwrqyTMH8TaZmb InUWyWgHGS2+fqrRiKZ4hNzZqtVG9QLNNbIxO21leK3AbYp+gCMX/BINidCdQRG8 vZmVzCIsFXJPPr3MeVf0fz3NQUYQ17urpzwplz2AaH+utRTFw8PLOFODQA2pcTOK 04/KA9lP6L1nkrk20asKB5zLAIZ0Cf7xPoCnP1Mz/XXRqW/JSDnJ3rKKItGYFBNZ BhqKKSWB4UGfLzkGOQRziQ0l1lGKsHVCzsXhg/VmpXcz2ivsB2QkJLGYAv76YETc ZrO6NluqsIOx+hPyPEy1QuOANSOfg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ROUXXooJj1ajjkb2gXgEAgAw9YnyFd6XcM1Z9Y8o1mK_tL6RwRaSUQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdeivddggeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvthenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ROUXXi4B1nViErxQh_OtLFMUnrAOzp6biJx-6QRp4SLQpGMwqTnONQ> <xmx:ROUXXoPBQC01sm6Rumh2LFohijBWG1hzUTFaWd5_fN44r1GSkzXHDg> <xmx:ROUXXkMgMYBZiLrTTddR0HJrQw0oaFEVEl-ii7DGpHaBNGPh0FWk8w> <xmx:ROUXXp6AIOrc3s5bUKIXwI6BoENPZpvKdJMbU9bEiyPD6ZS7ok2sKw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 75FF5E00A2; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:45:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-740-g7d9d84e-fmstable-20200109v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <84ff02fd-e0c0-4459-9f55-4631e803bceb@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <90C8D89F-0FB0-4C12-818A-63CC820FCB52@sinodun.com>
References: <4639bd67-6fca-47d1-aaeb-85fcd0394f46@www.fastmail.com> <7E5F804D-535F-4CB3-8F7F-ABD0ED4B833A@sinodun.com> <CABcZeBON0ung2htbaiKWGKJSUsHrPhrcEfJgVDoO3+UYCQZxsg@mail.gmail.com> <7729E44B-38EB-4EAF-8EFF-ED286696373E@sinodun.com> <CABcZeBNKsQ1pEVwxwYMgGTUhFntQ4h+L1Qyo=Q_nfN7p13y-UQ@mail.gmail.com> <90C8D89F-0FB0-4C12-818A-63CC820FCB52@sinodun.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:45:06 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, 'Eric Rescorla' <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/j-gf46iJvrnuf-sixx6tKXktbhg>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 02:45:30 -0000

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, at 05:03, Sara Dickinson wrote:
> “As with many other protocols issues around centralisation also arise 
> with DNS. The picture is fluid with several competing factors 
> contributing which can also vary by geographic region. These include:
> * ISP outsourcing, including to third party and public resolvers
> * regional market domination by one or only a few ISPs “
> 
> An increased proportion of the global DNS resolution traffic being 
> served by only a few entities means that the privacy considerations for 
> end users are highly dependant on the privacy policies and practices of 
> those entities.”

This seems fine, but I'd have to see it in context, I think.

> I also previously proposed referencing 
> draft-arkko-iab-internet-consolidation that Stephane mentioned, but Ekr 
> objected. 

That's a poor choice for any citation at this stage.  We're a long way from having clearly articulated views on the topic, let alone having any sort of consensus.