Re: [dns-privacy] Call for adoption: draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin

Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> Mon, 10 August 2020 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84693A16B0 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id riLgdaj60xtO for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (smtp.guxx.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:322c::25:42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3181A3A16A6 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id EA7505F4055D; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.146] (p54b8acc8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.184.172.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62EFD5F400AA; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:26:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:26:37 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <3960EED1-5120-4119-978D-7E5ECF8DD385@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <4b3271ee-e796-3102-1ead-d1f9a3137514@innovationslab.net>
References: <4b3271ee-e796-3102-1ead-d1f9a3137514@innovationslab.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/jYWgQpVeujMOH0U0rQqnomWMyKc>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call for adoption: draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:26:44 -0000

Moin!


On 10 Aug 2020, at 13:44, Brian Haberman wrote:

> Hi all,
>      During the DPRIVE session at IETF108, we discussed adopting
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin/
> and the results were inconclusive. The chairs would like to start a
> 2-week call for adoption to determine the WG's interest in this work.
I oppose adopting this draft. The problems space of connecting recursive
to authoritative currently has a lot of solution type drafts in 
different
working groups. There is this draft here, draft-tapril-ns2 in dnsop and
draft-pauly-add-resolver-discovery in add. So the working group chairs
have first to figure out where to discuss the problem (here is fine) and
then discuss them all or finish work on 
draft-ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements
first. Just adopting this one would narrow us to much as once something 
is
out it’s hard to remove it.

>      Please respond to the mailing list with your view (positive or
> negative) and supporting rationale on adopting the draft. This WGLC 
> will
> end on 2020-08-24 at 23:59 UTC.
I assume you mean the adoption call will end then ;-).

So long
-Ralf
—--
Ralf Weber