IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC...

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 18 August 2016 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAD412DB74 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FmnNsGf4jgig for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3334012DB6B for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l2so28416193qkf.3 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gBBB9otcwcrFf2FmYeyn02onf7lxfMuW4HZ45MQw4JM=; b=LhayUtSMNFgwGbPbFALEfjMwjcmLCq2KJ3UqdFI1YRnZuwqi0/ReZpCNXUOEnxO1Uf pxqUv2kRa/zI1Xy3PlnPek92EwsIj5nXDaTD3HzwC3VfRTyWE5Rg6JRwQt57o6LM819X wwmlc+EiZE0TUuctmhvkgoDF7gEaE0OI3dxTjxMkVkDn+UuBcwav6DuoSttgGn38nG2z PdCeMxC3jjbO5TBoAYTYax5mQNUuRGXwxwsOYgvlubtKaTA2rGHi2uDBCRgKGBEEfpKs 72PYnWzFYzXIVJcjWK7PTJ/ImRDuYN0wdLTG0GbjqLQuuFzaXomLNJSoZq7PB3+O8yBC gIpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gBBB9otcwcrFf2FmYeyn02onf7lxfMuW4HZ45MQw4JM=; b=d3RpN4kNLBknw7AKXKVqxFyVDlwIqmsAODniC+MrCFCfSgW8qUVYC8JpW544Uxg4Ru qWTlvCtNOs4fslvhyocwT0ud4nMfiu01aOG4/YvlNxaW/WNK171RvGDrkuZkcvjCkfjO iutp81bnaIiTX3Em3CRU7k8qeQC/O4bbYjwFReb+rDGSj7y+++SiC2YLsvU06bJLXRuU VimCr/lemsBfNQPoRxM7TtAd1B8k5VR7g0RvVLx96XVbYjU8f/NmzZz34+UO1XqqpBzJ AND1AlwIiw/Z2AQPoYB6QAnWOsyJUMXQs5fhjBNX+HzmWjBPlH8HHZT++8SDA9RyR/Zt wvmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOCn+P5MG3pBlFJj4Blv4kVF4kZrKfunKPCDYtRSL5BMpWdexC8anxEsPjhz4C68AFNJJSlvMA0dCESAkE+
X-Received: by 10.55.5.17 with SMTP id 17mr4795511qkf.280.1471553219260; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.176.199 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5512479A-CCA6-42A5-9A81-178C899183EA@isoc.org>
References: <CAHw9_iLjE5Yf28xH_Qy8nOCiyu-Q3fGxF6iQWm-OuXJSbjrRhA@mail.gmail.com> <27C92EFC-CB09-443F-A167-6E5A07E45B14@vpnc.org> <1471540514.3032.2.camel@env.dtu.dk> <5512479A-CCA6-42A5-9A81-178C899183EA@isoc.org>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:46:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+SuHgKUtbjTVYZBLeWMofQ0FkLM7eiw25bJPq44pY75Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/kl5GQM9zaHBgOmbUXFkX6QR1scU>
Cc: Hugo Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] After the DNS-over-DTLS WGLC...
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:47:02 -0000

Great.

I just put in the session request...

W

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Hugo Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 09:06 -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On 16 Aug 2016, at 10:08, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
> At the moment we are expecting to meet  in Seoul, partly to discuss
> the Profiles document, but also as a “BoF style” discussion on the
> Phase 2 work.
>
> Thoughts? Views? etc.
>
> A BoFy kind of discussion about recursive-to-authoritative would be
> very
> useful. The privacy advantages are obvious, but the various types of
> costs are important too.
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>
> +1
>
>
> +1. Agree this discussion would be useful.
>
> Dan
>
> --
> Dan York
> Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society
> york@isoc.org   +1-802-735-1624
> Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org
> Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email