IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: (with COMMENT)

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 08 February 2020 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC021200A4; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 00:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zx4WAUfAywTx; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 00:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x143.google.com (mail-il1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1264120033; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x143.google.com with SMTP id g12so1632966ild.2; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8hNqoipU0Azkxkkjq7pZ1cZHoqxsrlHTT2OqNEBwPOY=; b=t9FwE1EK2vmTp+sKSq9zbWJ0yCiGX2tSfPG4HAf8E1doH807RM8TzTCSVfiPE7hZLJ hYFP4/cDu1FxemrRCebW06rBAS6bruvFEOBtfym31Lsg5WUfPRrV+3nSa0OHd3Xlsk2x 0CuDslZl7nNjO2zonShcNtgfcJZJ5D2KPCrjEGnTpGLLgegMZk0oAVWzQ8fi55CU7Znc 8viBEjAI6qL+smARspe3l0dJNEk/lBcLb5lO3fDnU4bUgbchnPDSt4wibTxFXiznkVkU CkdT1yhgCbpvxWgvpUrzgKQWId29mMMJGOuQgWV1l72D5X2wzixlYpcowR9af9P10TQE hqIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8hNqoipU0Azkxkkjq7pZ1cZHoqxsrlHTT2OqNEBwPOY=; b=EcpR6kQkQ7sM/6epcvs1P4U66e5YKOmM+tuq1c6jvnbZiDNSHcNv57sw9nnh8F2BW0 UwHFfWBuODuMA5DsAtWLnlJyGQi0SX6SbeSL/aX40lnxVGpFZyrqxR56JPwt5STu2+Z9 MLITD8JK37AG4/TXRxJYAbuhk1Sol3mDD7iRPTe60ridFM7CUnGoqwV8HGLSAaursvyR 7e5ZNAf0gkU7Ob91FGzBDVaWYl/jyGd2i6LeJmN/yluZYckalLj0mlMaVoSlSEp/nANZ 4VkDwjI176wq5EKjv/cK6TE+NRc+km443beo/4c1jydzMvS45CEgbb70hzqgm2xJ1/dE EdSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXcjj4tjY/3bfqK++enOQ93Gm1Paldae0k6S+APy4Imp4pR46ax EZUPzRSqu+oBC2+dbabsAFhE5yHGPhU7nBod95M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLgasG+oecij/T4nUvv74HYlT4UzAFqWWOZTkAY4Y1lvrbpan6emZVvruz14yaVkpaeKMLznoiTN2sSf3CzUE=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:990b:: with SMTP id p11mr3356771ili.254.1581150381170; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBNf5OvHJBoDA8b9gaEpWW0=weWq0S3TTYV+60pEGjfnkw@mail.gmail.com> <FB13F0AC-5A31-4DB4-9CAA-54DCD78CA871@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FB13F0AC-5A31-4DB4-9CAA-54DCD78CA871@gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:26:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxT1Fda+kuyb8s7htmb3P49AT7tU7eZ0vztic5g4pG_kQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op@ietf.org, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce6402059e0c42d5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/m0qOiAP0Innzpa7W0DdWmyCNMr0>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 08:26:24 -0000

Hi,

Maybe DNSSEC should not appear in a consensus document until it is shown to
work. Here are some opinions about it that are negative:

https://twitter.com/colmmacc/status/979234954440617990

https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2019-2/avoiding-unintended-harm-to-internet-infrastructure/

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email