IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 18 March 2021 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041903A19D6 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=edc/SOs4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VYu/kFDb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EREBisNdhexQ for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 395873A19D9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AA21EFA; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:15:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=J1m0wgEZPjEawpFSjyjHx1Dy34Ra vfmZAwIuDfK8cm4=; b=edc/SOs41ds5uI4U3Nne/bvbqZ7Y+ukRYvDOzXopyKJp jLM8iJ3f5rCSm4K2lncgZVO+QVUN400V1HI3kyQasdskxwG+WQf4JeRRmvTgctxV cZgJLqiR/br2/X987HtYhHMW9lczKNB2dsZwZwitOGbYOSbk0xdb7Y99VgTbWq44 M4ynqDDeUz3NF0KnwyWMO7dedukCMM9f9sUtrvUYl21Q0+xmvskotbDKBN33L/5P x9nTy+HkVMjG3t8RWQSZePQ2tvV/T8w9W+7WI085LqidRfNHf/1eEe8lOnzHNR9D +7PKdplRrlWTSjmo7KfsN5STug9MQ7cNIUTYkzBkTQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=J1m0wg EZPjEawpFSjyjHx1Dy34RavfmZAwIuDfK8cm4=; b=VYu/kFDbTS4J39arF09W4p ESt8s1mJNOoODV3xUngK3Ay6y7wfT0DQU8XsJrxLWFtj3aA4TQaPp2n2cEQ5F3p5 mfPh0Z3ayaMW1HP8zrmWSVDdcCySYeliFMllMi1RnKCvqV/wvD8zBJlQIm67fUbq orwaNt0Y3jc4ANcYwPxcZrb5pUXWrMI9oDR2JPc3jlSrDJ5YkwtPHo6X4iS9AEJF oEWl12SyDpmosSjkCP4/1YgDNBF8xU0fTH0StXAn2YRptlTQStBUVj3TTjfzRjdW JxY42V00Io5byIgUzgPdxI1K/eGqd1EaSwnheKN0geXHJbLnkfq3BvegJ79AWvrw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qKlSYNsZxXDIXIti4kMUJrpc8tKZCyV6GiXiow7vC9I5rD1-0W-luQ> <xme:qKlSYGfgACHrlTCgbO0XkaWHEjMV77Jg7RuiWTLTPWnbCIslxXRRnxLKoAL7IkWyi f5HU6u1xQiN-lRLSMQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudefhedgfeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeeuffeviefguedvhfethfeukeejueekfedtieefveevuddtkedv ieegfefhffetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophih rdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qKlSYAxuUP9jmnzozyZt_bpVHqybwDXO_EKMIbn3ylSjMPQE2iBjZQ> <xmx:qKlSYEMPERgIh62wqLj99O6pbx-M3N7zg6E4vlGhitoi7kmU9-pXbA> <xmx:qKlSYN91AfuL33W9WkqkYye9mtCt2mrKY3Hy1uy3R3gpuTnLcyHk5Q> <xmx:qKlSYCIZJKSDRAn11ZxNiP9-lFv1JrDry6-hpi5Hpz7wLO9h-Fhy-A>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2219F4E05B4; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-206-g078a48fda5-fm-20210226.001-g078a48fd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8156895c-adb2-4fc6-8407-6d7c6ded0823@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMG9tJjngMa0sbvY212a4Gbz6dKO7ZfZamCeXfOQyNWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net> <3c1794d0-bc1f-42ed-a881-4c40676715db@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBMG9tJjngMa0sbvY212a4Gbz6dKO7ZfZamCeXfOQyNWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:14:59 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: 'Eric Rescorla' <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/pGB9HPyVjvEKDeUbNlTktwKm0g0>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 01:15:27 -0000

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 11:04, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> To clarify my position: i would favor a proposed standard based on 
> O-HTTP.  I just think it's unfortunate to have something that is 
> approximately O-HTTP but not precisely as PS at the same time as we are 
> also standardizing O-HTTP

Makes sense.  I would question the value of publishing the experimental approximately-but-not-quite-O-HTTP version then.  Unless we fail majestically in chartering and executing there, we're not talking about significant delays.

Regarding O-HTTP, we have in-principle agreement to charter a working group and I've drafted a charter (preview: https://github.com/unicorn-wg/ohttp-charter).  That will be discussed on the secdispatch@ list as soon as I send that email.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email