Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E8312944D for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 02:49:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nA8lo3Zf6Ajj for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 02:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A534A12953C for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 02:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 154E031D66; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:49:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52ADCEC0B74; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:48:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:48:40 +0200 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: Tim Wicinski Message-ID: <20161007094840.GA27400@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> References: <5dc29c0c-9f34-dcac-8d94-f2722ee6a4ba@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5dc29c0c-9f34-dcac-8d94-f2722ee6a4ba@gmail.com> X-Transport: UUCP rules X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Archived-At: Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profile X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:49:29 -0000 On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:58:09AM -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote a message of 28 lines which said: > This starts a Working Group Last Call for: > draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profile Executive summary: OK for me, draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-03 can (and should) be published. I find that touchy issues, such as the relationship with the authentication mechanisms described in RFC 7858, or such as the table 1 "DNS Privacy Protection by Usage Profile and type of attacker" are nicely done. The table 1 could use some details about the possibility of detection for passive attacks (for active attacks, it is addressed in section 5). These details were promised in :-) Technical question: The document seems to use "X.509" and "PKIX" as synonyms. Is it really the case? Small legal detail: > this application [extended to be used for recursive clients and > authoritative servers] is out of scope for the DNS PRIVate Exchange > (DPRIVE) Working Group per its current charter. A bit exaggerated: the current charter says "it [the DPRIVE WG] may also later consider mechanisms that provide confidentiality between Iterative Resolvers and Authoritative Servers" Editorial detail: > but may be the subject of a future I-D. Should probably be removed before it becomes a RFC.