Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72854129F8F for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:59:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8Hblhl4WRzY for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:59:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665BF129F87 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i145so121978276ywg.2 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:59:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GgFnf40AiR85nrva5YwJiaNCyH7+YE7kvBpJR+pqboI=; b=ksCdahkojGkeIOFfBRh1dHfWLiYmxcHxFLoOjUuKfGny93TmKUNbMP8L5bn4/yPdtb J+1OzVDrw2QeZsvYLzrV2WfLvKcMKCRg3qWLSqgIZz+GPEOHQx20IWVkDXVBgdm6/jXS yfnDgtc2K5LhAFgex4vH6ZRhnpRS1KV6b9ZyT9MlfLQAqToac96ZPPbTu5navMEvL/TV HybIJAwJtdGZboaSTZb4gwQaqPZDfxLeV/EGuoctF1RJbDzDOfB+rEucDVaJWni8iaMd KXAApGUoUZBrf5IDI4Tw3k3yH3ADU87ydlGu2TRWQZegLWc/qMd5rsFQU+xcvm/1tJrI 8RIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GgFnf40AiR85nrva5YwJiaNCyH7+YE7kvBpJR+pqboI=; b=AigfJjYmY/cu4XxDFCjf6OAGORjiyriYn+hYgfjTIAYAzph5JY5oxxYaRXgWELv6al hd/qsfyKkZWeYGII1rcUlYARhXuUJWE+OURPKIL1EewqFzjgWMc0/HYp6GCaNRnDvzdq PZX6PJz3DtDzRV+4oXZTs0KkQzQxv5Fn23u3nfGp0vOTdDwXrdzsoZr8VhrOuIMs6fPb +MXEOnABqse0/XAFUYUEal9UKO/4iJZeKd+EY6hrm48TjWlWLlAR1kQss+buD6uwW0GD ma2Klab3vFTRfZpYmHbFk5SHNhJR/RhHglfYNK6jFD7LRcx7qZ/H3qij5cOASsSvalfv d+OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03DZYkahSdbg/b/9YY+ITAZUu66yVPI6UhnW35gMoq/J13SPCVi91Y+y5PzXlEP/ydGqkEvbIcUv1lemX83 X-Received: by 10.129.169.132 with SMTP id g126mr27256268ywh.92.1480355945326; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:59:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.177.65 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:59:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20161118141331.6f2bbfba@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> From: Bob Harold Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:59:04 -0500 Message-ID: To: Sara Dickinson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c145a6a4337ce0542603a1a Archived-At: Cc: Shane Kerr , "dns-privacy@ietf.org" , Warren Kumari Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:59:09 -0000 --94eb2c145a6a4337ce0542603a1a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Sara Dickinson wrote: > > > On 18 Nov 2016, at 06:13, Shane Kerr wrote: > > > > Warren, > > > > At 2016-11-18 13:42:08 +0900 > > Warren Kumari wrote: > > > >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-mayrhofer-dprive- > padding-profile. > >> > >> The draft is available here: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive- > padding-profile/ > >> > >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for > >> adoption by DPRIVE, > >> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > > > I have read this draft and support its adoption by DPRIVE. > > +1 > > > > >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > > > I am willing to contribute text, and review, and even etc. if necessary. > > +1 > > > > > -------- > > > > Note there was some discussion today in the working group about the > > approach that this document takes. The concern is that this seems to be > > a survey of possible techniques. Personally I think it makes sense to > > have two documents: > > > > 1. A review of all possible approaches (the current document), and > > 2. Recommendations for implementors (based on pending research and > > analysis). > > > > If we really only want one document, then probably it should start with > > recommendations and then include the review of techniques as an > > appendix. > > I happen to favour this second approach of just one document, evolving the > structure of the draft as the recommendations become clearer. > > Sara. > I support and will review. Prefer one doc. -- Bob Harold --94eb2c145a6a4337ce0542603a1a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:

> On 18 Nov 2016, at 06:13, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
>
> Warren,
>
> At 2016-11-18 13:42:08 +0900
> Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.n= et> wrote:
>
>> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-mayrhofer-dprive-pa= dding-profile.
>>
>> The draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker= .ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile/
>>
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for >> adoption by DPRIVE,
>> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> I have read this draft and support its adoption by DPRIVE.

+1

>
>> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review= , etc.
>
> I am willing to contribute text, and review, and even etc. if necessar= y.

+1

>
> --------
>
> Note there was some discussion today in the working group about the > approach that this document takes. The concern is that this seems to b= e
> a survey of possible techniques. Personally I think it makes sense to<= br> > have two documents:
>
> 1. A review of all possible approaches (the current document), and
> 2. Recommendations for implementors (based on pending research and
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0analysis).
>
> If we really only want one document, then probably it should start wit= h
> recommendations and then include the review of techniques as an
> appendix.

I happen to favour this second approach of just one document, evolvi= ng the structure of the draft as the recommendations become clearer.

Sara.

I support and will review.=C2=A0 Prefer one doc.

--=C2=A0
Bob Harold


--94eb2c145a6a4337ce0542603a1a--