Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: New draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and draft-pp-dprive-common-features

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 26 May 2021 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655323A125B for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=innovationslab-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_Ng0VtEr_AC for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4993A1257 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id v18so1418326qvx.10 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=innovationslab-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=LIdjczlLQS/OlsKgyUGW/0G1EjsXz2pmUehaNDn/20M=; b=Y7C5KlwEGzwW/0p9q2TANjHlxWZQq5xNT/1KlABhWaMIVC+1804zIHisU2pWlrSPjA 1yy5PxURM+Y0HccnjTsHtCcXQW2Px3mw7anY9rk86y8BZDDhWGJe9baoYvE3tcUkxhnn V7ev6IGW1FhofT31oiJW+TMP8bSWNCz4ym9tNmLcic9G2W1BnNMB4e/RRS1JRWnCZgMh /d/14mqrXofgvWXIoUd2eVUQT/VO7SmNMgPn0O7aQlo2V25okH0WsNNmi1xOM+K3C7uB Fko2ZFDef9RRJObI9OLXNPHMYvucBjrGC5aQthLpy7+mWGtrqPoV+HF6AsGq3WP7louI pfCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=LIdjczlLQS/OlsKgyUGW/0G1EjsXz2pmUehaNDn/20M=; b=sa3mnMJhi/rIPLqMSDbWycW9nFa5a/+0twB3KIa9iFiX7+Vce9dEo3ap3E0QAyEVhL ewWrSzzTtx8l7b8S+BzijspoycVVmq5GbHhwrX/l6lxoa4iy/YZR4e70VxCNhbYeenj4 ImOsuwZMZiF1w1LQuLZ3uPG7/b38+Alu1a6XMVJ23SuuWvdaeOKV2w91MLT4M3icMcjv xzuHrzLR7sRX8yIEqHSg0o0HxqynzLCNGjJvtewSltaQAICzK70+qq5tEjtu+8aHMYyZ D053HZGoapmLeslkKdL5SzHTG9ISL8zCIcxh2Lz0bqm0GLoSHeASQzsKe4ofFMCA5XQ+ aJ7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Y+eAThfeswZe+YYU2GCwShwyxLzI3avxkt2O4/lvMWzFtjDt+ Kct6Zc7Dx7DH8JmELFvT5DNkjuhfMmPZdU3H
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz71/Ype6mE9Zw4bcOd0EY1nh2xSqG1aqtbG3saH1N8DeXxFctPWaXZAXzTFdrpEb0MlCpdcg==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:53cc:: with SMTP id k12mr94205qvv.49.1622059640040; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local ([2601:5ce:300:84e:79fe:eda4:f42e:7b53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p17sm2303395qkg.67.2021.05.26.13.07.19 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 May 2021 13:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
References: <B27C4F2E-D5AF-428B-BBD1-A57E7D676BD5@icann.org> <CADyWQ+E9jpV0BwMsaS8=vNbs7x87d4qqGbKQevj8MVGCLGyv5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <b997a2f3-b7aa-0b5a-9e65-1822c8bf8389@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:07:18 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+E9jpV0BwMsaS8=vNbs7x87d4qqGbKQevj8MVGCLGyv5w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mbg6uS40M1afL30GJAGAaDiWeUesZCTwQ"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/w4V2W_-KgfVicaxMqvfmn0G9zho>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: New draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and draft-pp-dprive-common-features
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 20:07:27 -0000

Just to clarify given some of the feedback provided... This is not a
formal call for adoption. Rather, the chairs are soliciting feedback to
better inform the draft development process.

Regards,
Brian

On 5/25/21 5:16 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> All
> 
> The authors took the advice from the working group and extracted the more
> common features
> into a separate document.   The chairs would like the working group to give
> some comments, as
> we feel a document like this should be considered for adoption.
> 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pp-dprive-common-features/
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pp-dprive-common-features-01.txt
> Please read and comment on this draft.
> 
> thanks
> tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
> Date: Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:59 PM
> Subject: [dns-privacy] New draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and
> draft-pp-dprive-common-features
> To: dprive@ietf.org <dprive@ietf.org>
> 
> 
> Greetings again. Peter and I have revised
> draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and
> draft-pp-dprive-common-features based on recent mailing list traffic. One
> major change is that we realized that we could move even more sections from
> unauth-to-authoritative to common-features because they would apply to the
> fully-authenticated use case. Please review them to see if you agree.
> 
> If people like the idea of us splitting out common features, it would be
> good if it too became a WG document, particularly to help focus the
> discussions on the unauthenticated and fully-authenticated use cases.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman and Peter van Dijk
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pp-dprive-common-features-01.txt
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-01.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>