IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 14 December 2016 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8CE1293E4; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:01:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6rWr8jCWwHT; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BACB0129663; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FC7BE53; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:00:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFlGCXHvvY63; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:00:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04B65BE50; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:00:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1481724049; bh=x3FRdUCw0BR9mSDDF1nxFsAdIRhGa1MBohk5UNSNFUY=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=08sWHbKOa3MrBsbcoyojdU2CmAiNLR1aIAKkkI6tc9WxtSqyueGRSJ0xdRFKgjQk1 U7u3yc6nFgBoeVPGAtuxgdqXCQ9UJAkNXHs8vo+ayzkg4Z+WabRdbLliV/TlIEMS+p VdTFmRtzoWJXP/QeRZw2ck1sKMsPlsWCtBDRmkA0=
To: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <148163419601.29447.15218887979317459041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <b07056c0051f4c10b43aab2f10916583@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com> <f7f5c629-55e1-b256-0fe1-0b445eecf6a2@cs.tcd.ie> <0717cf40cf0c4cefae22fc23d1342e93@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <1cca7635-3eee-3f86-d84b-fa8915261014@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:00:48 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0717cf40cf0c4cefae22fc23d1342e93@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms030208030109030808060709"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/wobVH0bFRAHrfXdeVS8y42fNR9s>
Cc: "tjw.ietf@gmail.com" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls@ietf.org>, "dprive-chairs@ietf.org" <dprive-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:01:20 -0000


On 14/12/16 13:50, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:
> I don't see a problem, DTLS handshake is capable of handling
> fragmentation and reassembly

Of course it is, silly of me to forget:-)

I think we're sorted now, assuming that the wg are ok
with the suggested changes, (I am).

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email