IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 26 May 2023 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853E0C151B0A for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2HL2GQruJoTw for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2935FC151524 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTPS id 34QI0nH3014593 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 May 2023 18:00:49 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.26; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:00:47 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.026; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:00:47 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
CC: George Thessalonikefs <george@nlnetlabs.nl>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [dns-privacy] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing
Thread-Index: AQHZj/v/Ckrl50xovES45gm/yqOeFw==
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:00:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D7C916AC-E47D-45FE-9976-188DAE0775EF@icann.org>
References: <64e17d73-ea1a-00cb-a8a5-b5cfb39c37ae@innovationslab.net> <45ada5a8-b483-dae7-eb56-88411fb2f75c@innovationslab.net> <7a3cd83a-b80d-f00d-b050-0a1d4845146b@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <7a3cd83a-b80d-f00d-b050-0a1d4845146b@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D5878ABE8F9C1D46B068F31C0F4810FC@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-05-26_08,2023-05-25_03,2023-05-22_02
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/xUwYAMuzPnM3Fc1JvlbG8jjDam8>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:00:53 -0000

On Apr 14, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> All,
>     An update on the status of this draft. I have asked the authors to review all the feedback, provide the mailing list with responses to the comments, and then publish a new version.

We believe that -06 deals with all of the WG Last Call issues raised, except one. We didn't understand "## E" in Yorgos' message from April 7. Yorgos: could you reformulate that concern based on the -06 draft?

>     Thanks to everyone who has provided feedback to date!

Indeed! The draft feels much tighter now.

--Paul Hoffman (for Joey and dkg)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email