Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 31 March 2021 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9453A2959 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=innovationslab-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKJ4qRr-h5fh for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0B73A2958 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id t5so9925977qvs.5 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=innovationslab-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=3bCYd/YHmZ1/c2xytNUe1S/IZQR2e0Z7llckYSYM1Tc=; b=sbGBRL64uGs8cOl+6zlzwK20E/idU6rav1XFh1QLkfBCOcLIqq0NFBbrly0/kh/WX0 E8levz0DS0pAi5OOtx+OIx3fMD1UM/+5IEUIL2u30k9UBqO/a3AKOAwgTV6PAUD0B3uF /GyydmycJtR+acCDLz3OeJGqXMIZJ1cy55JsSkEeCiFj3BOwM6RHMPps2Gvms/40Yi+/ mKo66MyRQMGXgpWLMDFN6rj9QZXXQSVIfeZAaUBOJD+9ofg/dgqvUIl/FCRt7wt6k/1e AjJuKS4bbLPl61bEnNKmYyppeiM3Vlr7MTZtdCai4dk0VDwAzYEpkfv1JnTA9ReisUL/ hMlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3bCYd/YHmZ1/c2xytNUe1S/IZQR2e0Z7llckYSYM1Tc=; b=kRKv3U/gvy8M1MFjunMhDYlbaLWvmG7zJMUFp3y3Murkgc9rLdsh/noqjjcHAJ7/nV 2xZAt8vhoTWtcGlf02Svmj+bzU6s6CxjC5lFqLwk4M62wJdKy/PUnD3lwHstGydOw87k XXi8gHlxIUKIand3+VxyMtMyGD/AAeBPkpnSE0UXw8b2dIH/FOEKVkaJdDwino9wEVho JAO2DkabiWmlvgB+ltCPATRU5qRaExeksKXFGCIS9fpwold6hT1hCI34OeBvazVUwrEI WnudFX+1mcQPBgYtu0bt/GPQdxA/FNiQdxRn9Om3/oIqPwwIXIwz/I1uOoZvUAmJJusu gLJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532GrbGeEwSyBmjdt3h5I9OAOIVS9Jecy3vaa5P8dHSS6/5M1rFz Hy2HHmq92yHhg2lgSSc3EXPqNbgu3J1K6jMP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwU6e1HCS9Y8TQ4xIxpdMoOGWhWotaWzVZwCEkwG/U5o4PfYvPztuycP2Gdr6Sj7ly7ykjDnA==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f349:: with SMTP id e9mr2865700qvm.59.1617198881619; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local ([2601:5ce:300:84e:fd6a:d664:b700:96d5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g2sm1423859qtu.0.2021.03.31.06.54.40 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
References: <CAMGpriX5rbswMQnjh4gZqsLjh2xUJxjJVxe2rEAVu=RdLAbGFw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOntrAqq_bVL-y-BP0DZLvYmVMkvKqi8K0D_SFqAfCVXg@mail.gmail.com> <96c2475d-ad93-a442-2003-db6f8782e450@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMGpriXdU7_mJh8CQvSiZGQaDUD9aZF=0iYu0yKBS06khAHgng@mail.gmail.com> <4094551f-4b39-a996-f12f-8c5317c4fe21@nic.cz> <20210331092449.GD10597@nic.fr> <cefd04bf-8685-1894-ef3a-b61ce6a37167@innovationslab.net> <155BAF8D-9F65-4C5C-9EB1-58EFD70827B5@rfc1035.com> <c1ae3401-2565-016b-7acc-4891d0bde067@cs.tcd.ie> <a8eacd5988df461c9ec3c858dd426bb7@verisign.com> <20210331130534.GA28113@nic.fr> <514BEB95-A207-482B-88FA-D420EE66A152@rfc1035.com> <fae90d10-034e-da7b-3447-2ada2416790f@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <af951e8d-f488-f85c-3f6b-411736692a55@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:54:39 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fae90d10-034e-da7b-3447-2ada2416790f@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kzGFSa47565NNQ7qendpNvHqnTsQnwZvt"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/xoLCRmmjfLfkAZsWsYgFdvERxY0>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:54:48 -0000


On 3/31/21 9:40 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 31/03/2021 14:32, Jim Reid wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 31 Mar 2021, at 14:05, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> RFC 7626 (the threat model and problem analysis that some people
>>> claim is missing) is clear (section 2.5.2 for instance).
>>
>> Stephane, RFC7626 is 6 years old. It predates the DoH and DoT (and
>> soon DoQ) specs. 
> 
> RFC7626 was IMO quite important in enabling those later
> protocols, so that age and sequence are signs of success.
> 
>> Some other risks have changed since 2015 too.
>>
>> It’s not your fault that fine RFC has been OBE. :-)
> 
> I'm not sure what point you're making there tbh, but I
> don't believe 7626 is OBE when it comes to considering
> privacy issues arising from interactions between recursives
> and TLDs, which is a big part of what we're discussing
> here I hope.

And 7626bis is in the RFC Editor's queue...

Brian