[dns-privacy] [IANA #1228441] Protocol Action: 'DNS over Dedicated QUIC Connections' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11.txt)

[Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

We've removed RFC 8094 from the reference field for the tcp port:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=domain-s

It might be appropriate to make a change like this to the IANA Considerations section:

OLD:

Additionally, IANA is requested to update the Description field for
the corresponding TCP port 853 allocation to be 'DNS query-response
protocol run over TLS' for consistency and clarity.

NEW:

Additionally, IANA is requested to update the Description field for
the corresponding TCP port 853 allocation to be 'DNS query-response
protocol run over TLS' for consistency and clarity and to remove 
RFC 8094 from the TCP allocation's Reference field.

I'll tell the RFC Editor the actions are complete.

thanks,
Amanda

On Mon Apr 11 14:57:46 2022, [e-mail] wrote:
> Yes: DoT for the TCP port and QUIC/DTLS for the UDP port.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 6:39 AM Sara Dickinson <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Just to clarify the request is remove the RFC8094 reference against
> > the
> > TCP port assignment (because the description was modified to remove
> > DTLS
> > from this port description). DNS-over-DTLS  would remain listed
> > against the
> > UDP port assignment as previously agreed, and as listed below.
> >
> > Sara.
> >
> > > On 11 Apr 2022, at 14:15, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Let me loop in the TSV Area Directors as they may share my view
> > > that
> > DNS-over-DTLS should be kept in the IANA registry
> > >
> > > -éric
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sara Dickinson <[e-mail]>
> > > Date: Saturday, 9 April 2022 at 17:47
> > > To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> > > Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
> > > "[e-mail]" <
> > [e-mail]>, Eric Vyncke <[e-mail]>, Erik Kline <
> > [e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "
> > [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "
> > [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> > > Subject: Re: [IANA #1228441] Protocol Action: 'DNS over Dedicated
> > > QUIC
> > Connections' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11.txt)
> > >
> > > Hi Amanda,
> > >
> > > Thank you - all the changes look correct but we have one minor
> > request.
> > >
> > > Given that DNS-over-DTLS has been removed from the port 853 TCP
> > > entry
> > ‘description' field, it seems correct to also remove the reference to
> > RFC8094 from the ‘reference’ field for consistency. Could that change
> > please be made?
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Sara.
> > >
> > >>> Service Name: domain-s
> > >>> Port Number: 853
> > >>> Transport Protocol: tcp
> > >>> Description: DNS query-response protocol run over TLS
> > >>> Assignee: [IESG]
> > >>> Contact: [IETF Chair]
> > >>> Registration Date: 2015-10-08
> > >>>  Modification Date: 2022-04-01
> > >>> Reference: [RFC7858][RFC8094]
> > >
> > >> On 8 Apr 2022, at 20:34, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-
> > >> [e-mail]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dear Authors,
> > >>
> > >> This is a reminder that we need a reply to the message below.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >> Amanda Baber
> > >> IANA Operations Manager
> > >>
> > >> On Sat Apr 02 01:06:51 2022, amanda.baber wrote:
> > >>> Dear Authors:
> > >>>
> > >>> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
> > >>>
> > >>> We've completed the registry actions for the following RFC-to-be:
> > >>>
> > >>> draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11
> > >>>
> > >>> ACTION 1:
> > >>>
> > >>> The following entry has been added to the TLS Application-Layer
> > >>> Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol IDs registry:
> > >>>
> > >>> DoQ     0x64 0x6F 0x71 ("doq")  [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11]
> > >>>
> > >>> Please see
> > >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values
> > >>>
> > >>> ACTION 2:
> > >>>
> > >>> An additional reference and an updated description have been
> > >>> listed
> > >>> for UDP port 853, and the word "DTLS" has been removed from the
> > >>> description of the corresponding TCP port. These two
> > >>> registrations now
> > >>> read as follows:
> > >>>
> > >>> Service Name: domain-s
> > >>> Port Number: 853
> > >>> Transport Protocol: tcp
> > >>> Description: DNS query-response protocol run over TLS
> > >>> Assignee: [IESG]
> > >>> Contact: [IETF Chair]
> > >>> Registration Date: 2015-10-08
> > >>>  Modification Date: 2022-04-01
> > >>> Reference: [RFC7858][RFC8094]
> > >>>
> > >>> Service Name: domain-s
> > >>> Port Number: 853
> > >>> Transport Protocol: udp
> > >>> Description: DNS query-response protocol run over DTLS or QUIC
> > >>> Assignee: [IESG]
> > >>> Contact: [IETF Chair]
> > >>> Registration Date: 2015-10-08
> > >>> Modification Date: 2022-04-01
> > >>> Reference: [RFC7858][RFC8094][RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11]
> > >>>
> > >>> Please see
> > >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers
> > >>>
> > >>> ACTION 3:
> > >>>
> > >>> The following entry has been added to the Extended DNS Error
> > >>> Codes
> > >>> registry:
> > >>>
> > >>> 26      Too Early       [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11]
> > >>>
> > >>> Please see
> > >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters
> > >>>
> > >>> ACTION 4:
> > >>>
> > >>> The following registry has been created under the "Domain Name
> > >>> System
> > >>> (DNS) Parameters" heading:
> > >>>
> > >>> DNS over QUIC Error Codes
> > >>> Expert(s): Unassigned
> > >>> Reference: [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11]
> > >>> Available Formats
> > >>>
> > >>> Range   Registration Procedures
> > >>> provisional (greater than 0x3f) Expert Review
> > >>> provisional registration Date field update      First Come First
> > >>> Served
> > >>> permanent, 0x00-0x3f    Standards Action or IESG Approval
> > >>> permanent, greater than 0x3f    Specification Required
> > >>>
> > >>> Value   Error   Description     Status  Specification   Date
> > >>> Contact
> > >>>
> > >>> 0x0     DOQ_NO_ERROR    No error        permanent       [RFC-
> > >>> ietf-
> > >>> dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3]      2022-04-01      [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> 0x1     DOQ_INTERNAL_ERROR      Implementation error    permanent
> > >>> [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3]      2022-04-01
> > >>> [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> 0x2     DOQ_PROTOCOL_ERROR      Generic protocol violation
> > >>> permanent       [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3]
> > >>> 2022-
> > >>> 04-01      [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> 0x3     DOQ_REQUEST_CANCELLED   Request cancelled by client
> > >>> permanent       [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3]
> > >>> 2022-
> > >>> 04-01      [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> 0x4     DOQ_EXCESSIVE_LOAD      Closing a connection for
> > >>> excessive
> > >>> load permanent       [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3]
> > >>> 2022-04-01      [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> 0x5     DOQ_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR   No error reason specified
> > >>> permanent       [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3]
> > >>> 2022-
> > >>> 04-01      [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> 0xd098ea5e      DOQ_ERROR_RESERVED      Alternative error code
> > >>> used
> > >>> for tests   permanent       [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section
> > >>> 5.3]
> > >>> 2022-04-01      [DPRIVE_WG]
> > >>>
> > >>> Please see
> > >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters
> > >>>
> > >>> Please let us know whether this document's registry actions have
> > >>> been
> > >>> completed correctly. Once we receive your confirmation, we'll
> > >>> notify
> > >>> the RFC Editor that the actions are complete. If a team of
> > >>> authors is
> > >>> responsible for the document, and the actions have been performed
> > >>> correctly, please send a single confirmation message.
> > >>>
> > >>> We'll update any references to this document in the registries
> > >>> when
> > >>> the RFC Editor notifies us that they've assigned an RFC number.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Amanda Baber
> > >>> IANA Operations Manager
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >