[dns-privacy] Scope of Privacy considerations

Tariq Saraj <tariqsaraj@gmail.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tariqsaraj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBAA129EE7 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXmvnfSmgQWV for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E14DC129EE1 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a124so225359364ioe.2 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=puApadjD4/2qosLcT+dwxaGyy0jfiRlofU67efbKQUk=; b=qrVRYQDf7HgOqiPegSYwkN1HFP/nBqzDQ94xSjxTf58Gn2aSHAOJT/W/HeRhrT4YnG Br4Urb/Xogs/HOff39m0kv71NEi44oKYhVG8Qmz2oXYxupJs0GozGVkjQtHLiHhHczp9 8pjBsz0FMwsPEvfxXhACkWYATFIVhyqQsfESKTUdQqda3N6WJHlNFwQJvxbnto/hwaxe CErcioOLzMXsEKyL1Dx0GpZ7ZvwJB+4Lk6OovXqONCOzr1o342WHdSirciT1v6qdFhNE eSo8DPG3itKHYeuTJ+0mAtq+HRFpqC1kE/JCJdME4GX6l0d5xofu/q2bX3TRt2npZifr vGzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=puApadjD4/2qosLcT+dwxaGyy0jfiRlofU67efbKQUk=; b=dZhd3CXMnQ6NVE4v6FnZVox1E5magfn4fNS5FEolyJRxzmf9FwW/E9+OIEcPUt8WRt 3LvrWpdJgx/vupRy74K5nEVOpzYuXpD16pahrIefOBoVJXNnyIx4vWKDyn9IxR636pBC L5fgtkLbEOGt5HJqePO8M5ZckrVU86JZXZIVMQNNLqKG2zGA4t++bHmWiMTwDASSkoz4 /u2FRfO80c+VeRKgDFomGXGYopvyeKXte5bYqVHI2IFN+hduxSgY/JVqNCiYD9tx1eFU quH99Ks8wGfPcVh1wPRfX8tVqYrXmqCcM2l9zoR5y4ck+TojcJLYY/7ArQud9TJPq7GJ 6A/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03sdqibejfMFrgpJoHcOnbjfAVfr1sTbzCCnX6hPeqGsz57/xTINx9KyFCZvht3lUH07lHrxh+OKcq7mA==
X-Received: by 10.36.178.81 with SMTP id h17mr17741034iti.98.1480334883947; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.254.9 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Tariq Saraj <tariqsaraj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:08:03 +0500
Message-ID: <CAAdbxrrft9MUSPzYWSZozxDQVaz-kydoczxD56uEP97Fd0EcEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045d96aee80aff05425b525b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/yTdSyYZNY_-dMlLxasi0M_aEStQ>
Subject: [dns-privacy] Scope of Privacy considerations
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:08:06 -0000

Hi all,
The recursive resolver always resolves query on behalf of stub-resolver,
thus I am still worried that why the scope of confidentiality for DNS
messages is still a subject of interest.
As, privacy is mostly an individual specific issue, and the term Personally
Identifiable Information (PII) is very specific, yet the scope is a subject
of matter.

-- 
Regards
Tariq Saraj
Riphah Institute of Systems Engineering, Islamabad